Machine Learning Lien Dispute Mediation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for resolving construction lien disputes are inefficient, often leading to high costs, delays, and emotional standoffs, as they typically involve legal action or collection agencies that are not receptive to compromise, and lack a systematic approach to tracking and managing lien disputes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a cloud-connected user device and server with a machine learning model that processes user data to identify and prioritize lien cases, determine dispute nature, calculate completion percentages, and propose timelines for completion, enabling effective mediation and collection of liens without legal action, by using predictive outputs for resolution, collectability, and resolution time parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If legal action or collection agencies are used to resolve lien disputes, then the dispute resolution authority is strengthened, but the costs and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispute resolution authorityVSAvoidresolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated mediation system that acts as an intermediary between lien claimants and property owners. This system uses machine learning models to evaluate lien cases, predict outcomes, and facilitate negotiations without requiring immediate legal intervention. The mediator (automated system) maintains the authority needed to resolve disputes while significantly reducing the time and cost associated with traditional legal pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation and prioritization of lien cases before they reach legal proceedings. By using machine learning models to assess case strength, predict resolution likelihood, and prioritize interventions, the system prepares and resolves many disputes in advance, preventing them from escalating to costly and time-consuming legal actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If traditional mediation methods are used without systematic tracking, then the process is simpler, but the efficiency and follow-up capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemediation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional system that combines case intake, machine learning evaluation, priority ranking, mediator assignment, communication management, and outcome tracking into a single unified platform. This universal system handles multiple mediation tasks simultaneously, improving overall productivity while managing complexity through integration rather than separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where mediation outcomes are fed back into the machine learning models to improve future predictions. The system tracks the status of each lien case, monitors resolution progress, and uses this information to refine its prioritization and mediator assignment algorithms, thereby continuously improving mediation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to evaluate lien cases, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies machine learning models selectively rather than uniformly to all cases. It uses the computationally intensive models only when needed for complex evaluations, while simpler cases receive streamlined assessment. This partial application approach maintains high prediction accuracy for difficult cases while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple stages with increasing complexity. Initial case screening uses lightweight algorithms, and only cases requiring detailed analysis proceed to full machine learning evaluation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high measurement precision where necessary while minimizing unnecessary computational expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230206367A1Smart intelligent lien dispute mediation system
Publication Date: 2023.06.29 NELSON NORMAN REGINALD
  • US20230206367A1 patent drawing
  • US20230206367A1 patent drawing
  • US20230206367A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system (100) and a method (200) for mediating lien disputes is described. The system (100) includes a processor (108) and a memory (110). The processor (108) is configured to retrieve a user data related to one or more types of lien cases from the memory (110). The processor (108) is configured to process the user data to identify and prioritize the one or more types of lien cases based on case factors. The processor (108) is configured to process the identified one or more types of lien cases as a training data to a machine learning model (112) to train the machine learning model (112). The training data includes inputs and one or more predictive outputs derived from the machine learning model's processing of the inputs. Thereafter, the machine learning model (112) is a smart intelligent system which determines each lien cases metric of resolution, collectability, and resolution time parameters.