Lifecycle Fragment Dynamic Discovery Runtime

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional content management systems lack flexibility, making it difficult to change lifecycle processes at runtime and reuse lifecycle fragments across different processes, leading to inefficiencies and increased design costs due to duplication and lack of consistency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing lifecycle fragments as reusable building blocks that can be bound at design time or runtime, allowing for dynamic discovery and composition of lifecycle processes, with options for linked or cloned fragments to manage updates and changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional lifecycle processes are used in content management systems, then system stability and consistency are maintained, but flexibility and adaptability at runtime are lost

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidconsistency

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The lifecycle process is segmented into reusable fragments that can be independently selected, combined, and executed at runtime. Each fragment represents a discrete portion of the lifecycle that can be dynamically assembled based on current business needs, enabling flexibility while maintaining overall process consistency through structured composition rules.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, pre-defined lifecycle processes to dynamic, runtime-configurable processes. Lifecycle fragments are discovered and selected automatically at runtime based on data from previous process steps, allowing the lifecycle behavior to adapt to changing conditions without compromising the structured consistency of the overall process framework.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If lifecycle processes are redesigned to respond to changing business rules, then adaptability improves, but time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidtime

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Common lifecycle fragments are pre-designed, pre-tested, and stored in a repository before they are needed. When a new lifecycle process is required, the system automatically discovers and selects appropriate pre-existing fragments, eliminating the need to redesign common processes from scratch and significantly reducing implementation time and cost.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Lifecycle fragments are designed to be universal and reusable across multiple different lifecycle processes. A single fragment can serve multiple purposes and be applied to different business scenarios, allowing one fragment to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate process designs, thereby reducing overall development time and resources.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If lifecycle processes are customized for each specific business scenario, then specificity and precision improve, but duplication and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveprecisionVSAvoidcomplexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifecycle process is divided into precise, atomic fragments that each perform a specific function. These segmented fragments can be precisely selected and combined to create customized lifecycle processes, achieving the needed precision for specific business scenarios without requiring complete custom designs, thereby reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple lifecycle fragments are merged and composed together to form complete lifecycle processes. By combining pre-existing fragments rather than creating everything from scratch, the system achieves customized precision for specific scenarios while reducing duplication and overall complexity through shared, reusable components.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If lifecycle fragments are reused across multiple lifecycles, then reusability and efficiency improve, but consistency and linkage management become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovereusabilityVSAvoidconsistency

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that track and monitor the usage of lifecycle fragments across different processes. This feedback information is used to automatically manage fragment linkage, resolve conflicts, and maintain consistency, enabling widespread reusability without compromising the complexity of consistency management.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary lifecycle manager component is introduced to handle the complexity of fragment reuse and consistency management. This mediator automatically discovers, selects, and coordinates fragment usage across multiple lifecycles, abstracting away the complexity from the user while enabling high reusability and maintaining consistency through centralized management.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12079753B2Lifecycle fragment and dynamic discovery of lifecycle fragment at runtime

Publication Date: 2024.09.03 OPEN TEXT CORP

AI summary

Systems and methods for are provided that make lifecycles flexible, so the behavior of the lifecycle can be changed dynamically at runtime based on certain conditions. Embodiments include a system and method that enables the use and reuse of lifecycle fragments in a lifecycle process. Lifecycle fragments can be discovered and executed at runtime based on input data and other conditions to provide flexibility and efficiency.