Lifetime Controller for Dynamic Power Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices often exceed their designed service lifetime due to conservative reliability analysis, leading to over-engineering and increased costs, while also allowing devices that do not experience worst-case conditions to have extended but unnecessary lifetimes.

Innovation Solution

A lifetime controller that monitors and manages operating conditions by allowing strenuous use initially, accumulating 'credit' for later high-stress periods, and reducing performance to extend the device's lifespan, thereby maintaining a low failure rate and accommodating user demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative reliability analysis is used to ensure devices meet target service lifetime, then device reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to over-engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of operating conditions based on real-time monitoring of stress factors and accumulated damage. The system adjusts operational parameters dynamically rather than using fixed conservative design margins, allowing the device to operate optimally while managing wear and tear throughout its lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operating conditions, stress factors, and device state, then uses this feedback to adjust control decisions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables reliable operation without requiring over-engineering, as the system adapts to actual device condition rather than relying on worst-case design assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If devices are designed with conservative margins to ensure lifetime, then failure rate is reduced, but productivity and performance are reduced due to limited strenuous operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure rateVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows temporary excessive operation beyond normal limits by accumulating and spending operational credit. When damage accumulation is low, the device can operate at higher performance levels or under more strenuous conditions, enabling productivity boosts without compromising long-term reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically changes operational parameters such as power consumption, processing load, and stress factors based on real-time device state. This allows the device to switch between conservative and aggressive operating modes, optimizing both reliability and productivity based on current conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If devices operate continuously at high performance levels, then productivity is improved, but device lifetime is reduced due to increased wear and tear

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring and control adjustments, alternating between high-performance operation and recovery periods. By cycling through different operational intensities and managing accumulated damage over time, the system maintains high average productivity while preventing excessive wear that would reduce device lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Adaptability or versatility

If operational credit is accumulated during low-stress periods to enable future high-stress operation, then adaptability is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device autonomously monitors its own state, accumulates operational credit based on actual wear and tear, and makes control decisions without external intervention. This self-service approach enables adaptive operation while keeping the control system relatively simple, as the device manages its own lifecycle based on real-time feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10067483B1Controlling electrical device based on temperature and voltage
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 APPLE INC
  • US10067483B1 patent drawing
  • US10067483B1 patent drawing
  • US10067483B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a lifetime controller is configured to monitor operating conditions for a device, and to control operating conditions based on the previous conditions to improve the reliability characteristics of the device while permitting strenuous use as available. For example, the lifetime controller may permit strenuous use when the device is first powered on. Once a specified amount of strenuous use has occurred, the controller may cause the operating conditions to be reduced to reduce the wear on the device, and thus help to extend the lifetime of the device. Similarly, if a device is used in less strenuous conditions, the controller may accumulate credit which may be expended by permitting the device to operate in more strenuous conditions for a period of time.