Vehicle Lift Arm Restraint Mechanism for Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle lift safety mechanisms fail to effectively prevent load-carrier arms from pivoting when the carriage is lifting away from the ground surface, particularly when support points are damaged, uneven, or dirty, leading to instability and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle lift system incorporating an arm restraint mechanism with a main bracket and locking rod, which can transition between a released configuration allowing pivoting and a locked configuration preventing pivoting, using a locking assembly with biased locking surfaces and a lever-activated lock transmission assembly to ensure the load-carrier arm remains stable during lifting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the load-carrier arm is made pivotable to accommodate different vehicle configurations, then the adaptability of the vehicle lift is improved, but the stability and safety during lifting deteriorates due to potential arm pivoting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different vehicle configurationsVSAvoidstability during lifting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arm restraint system transitions from a static constraint to a dynamic one that changes state based on carriage position. The locking rod is biased by a spring to automatically engage or disengage from the locking surface depending on whether the carriage is in the elevated or lowered position, allowing the system to adapt its constraint level dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking rod acts as an intermediary element between the arm restraint mechanism and the load-carrier arm. It mediates the interaction by providing a mechanical linkage that translates the vertical movement of the carriage into the engagement or disengagement of the locking mechanism, controlling the pivotability of the arm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If safety mechanisms are added to prevent arm pivoting, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during liftingVSAvoidcomplexity of safety mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arm restraint mechanism is designed to be self-actuating through the spring bias on the locking rod. The spring automatically pushes the locking rod into engagement with the locking surface when the carriage is elevated, and the mechanism self-disengages when the carriage is lowered, eliminating the need for external actuators, sensors, or control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking function is extracted as a separate, dedicated component (locking rod) that can be independently designed and positioned. This allows the locking mechanism to be implemented with minimal additional complexity, as the locking rod simply needs to interact with the existing arm restraint structure without requiring integration of complex control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If the arm restraint is designed to automatically lock during lifting, then the ease of operation is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic locking during liftingVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring bias on the locking rod creates a self-actuating system that automatically engages the locking mechanism when the carriage is elevated. The spring force continuously pushes the locking rod toward the locking surface, ensuring automatic engagement without requiring operators to manually activate any locking function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The arm restraint mechanism is integrated with the existing carriage and load-carrier arm structure. The locking rod is mounted to the arm restraint which is carried by the carriage, merging the safety function into the existing lifting mechanism rather than adding a completely separate system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11613452B2Arm restraints for vehicle lift and vehicle lift including the same
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 CANADA HYDRAULIQUE EQUIP INC
  • US11613452B2 patent drawing
  • US11613452B2 patent drawing
  • US11613452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a vehicle lift which is equipped with a safety assembly preventing a load-carrier arm to pivot once the vehicle is being lifted. The vehicle lift includes a lifting post which has a base, an upward post extending from the base, a carriage which is slidably and operatively mounted to the post structure, as well as a pivotable load-carrier arm pivotally mounted to the carriage for providing a support to the vehicle being lifted. Pivot of the arm provides positioning and adjustment beneath the vehicle. The vehicle lift further includes an arm restraint coupled to the load-carrier arm. The arm restraint is configured to operate between a released configuration, where a portion of the arm restraint engages with the base, thereby allowing the load-carrier arm to pivot, and a locked configuration, where the arm restraint is positioned above the base, thereby preventing the load-carrier arm from pivoting.