Lifter Fall Prevention Mechanism for Chain Breakage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lifters for conveying devices are ineffective in preventing sudden lowering of the workpiece support base when elevation/lowering drive chains break, leading to potential accidents due to the fall prevention mechanism's inability to engage the ratchet pawls effectively during chain failure.

Innovation Solution

The lifter incorporates a lowering process forcible fall prevention mechanism with operating levers and a link mechanism that switches ratchet pawls to the engaged orientation mechanically against the actuator's driving force when a movement difference occurs between crosslink mechanisms, ensuring the pawls engage with the ratchet gears to prevent collapse, and utilizes sensors to detect pawl engagement for emergency stop control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the fall prevention means uses ratchet pawls that are switched to unengaged orientations by actuators during lowering, then the lowering operation can be performed smoothly, but the fall prevention means becomes ineffective when the elevation/lowering drive chains break

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelowering operationVSAvoidfall prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by providing a forcible fall prevention mechanism that preemptively counteracts the potential failure of the actuator-based fall prevention system. When drive chain breakage is detected, the ratchet pawl is forcibly engaged with the ratchet gear through the operating lever and link mechanism, creating a backup safety barrier that prevents uncontrolled lowering before the situation can deteriorate into an accident.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by establishing a dual-layer fall prevention system where the first layer (actuator-controlled ratchet pawl) provides normal operation safety, and the second layer (forcible fall prevention mechanism) provides emergency protection. This layered approach ensures that if the primary fall prevention system fails, the secondary system is already in place to cushion against the harmful effect of uncontrolled lowering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If the ratchet pawl is engaged with the ratchet gear to prevent lowering, then fall prevention is effective, but the lowering operation cannot be performed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention effectivenessVSAvoidlowering operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by creating a switchable fall prevention system where the ratchet pawl can dynamically change its state between engaged and disengaged orientations. During normal lowering operation, the actuator switches the ratchet pawl to the unengaged orientation, allowing smooth operation. When chain breakage is detected, the system dynamically transitions to the engaged orientation through the forcible fall prevention mechanism, providing adaptive safety based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the fall prevention function into two independent subsystems: the primary fall prevention means (actuator-controlled ratchet pawl) that handles normal operation, and the secondary forcible fall prevention mechanism (operating lever with link mechanism) that handles emergency situations. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized for its specific function without interfering with the other, enabling both smooth operation and reliable safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the elevation/lowering drive chains are driven to lower the workpiece support base, then the base can be positioned at different heights, but sudden lowering can occur when the chains break

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight positioningVSAvoidsudden lowering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by establishing a detection system that monitors the operational status of the elevation/lowering drive chains and triggers the forcible fall prevention mechanism when breakage is detected. The system continuously senses the state of the drive chains and automatically activates the ratchet pawl engagement response when abnormal conditions occur, creating a closed-loop safety system that adapts to real-time operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration automatically restrains the collapsing crosslink mechanism at the broken chain side, preventing the workpiece support base from inclining excessively and ensuring safety by engaging the ratchet pawl with the ratchet gear, and allows for emergency stop of the elevation/lowering drive chains when a chain breaks, preventing accidents.

Implementation Method 1

ratchet pawls (38), moving horizontally in interlock with the respective movable support shafts (22a, 22b) and being engaged with the ratchet gears (37) by urging forces to deter lowering of the workpiece support base (14)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUring force: Force

Implementation Method 2

a lowering process forcible fall prevention mechanism (46) which includes a pair of operating levers (47a, 47b) and a link mechanism (48 to 49b), where the pair of operating levers (47a, 47b) switch the respective ratchet pawls (38) in the unengaged orientations to engaged orientations of being engaged with the ratchet gears (37) against driving forces of the actuators (39)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

The link mechanism (48 to 49b) is such that, when a difference arises in movement amounts of the respective movable support shafts (22a, 22b) during lowering of the workpiece support base (14), it converts the movement amount difference to an operating force of the operating lever (47a/47b) at the larger movement amount side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical energy conversion: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 4

a pair of right and left actuators, which, when the workpiece support base is lowered, switch and hold the respective ratchet pawls against the urging forces to and in unengaged orientations of being separated from the ratchet gears

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActuator force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS9938126B2Lifter
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 DAIFUKU CO LTD
  • US9938126B2 patent drawing
  • US9938126B2 patent drawing
  • US9938126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lifter is provided with operating levers, which, against driving forces of actuators that switch the ratchet pawls to unengaged orientations, switch the ratchet pawls to engaged orientations of being engaged with ratchet gears, is provided with a link mechanism, which, when a workpiece support base is being lowered by collapsing motions of a pair of right and left crosslink mechanisms supporting the workpiece support base and a difference arises in movement amounts of movable support shafts at lower end sides of the respective crosslink mechanisms, converts the movement amount difference to an operating force of the operating lever at the larger movement amount side, and is such that by the operating lever at one side being driven by the link mechanism, the operating lever switches the ratchet pawl at the larger movement amount side to the engaged orientation.