Vehicle Lifting Arms with Automatic Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle lifting devices are prone to unstable contact between the vehicle and the lifting pads due to unpredictable arm movements, which can lead to dangerous situations, especially when interacting with external forces or uneven vehicle surfaces, and do not adequately ensure safety and stability during lifting and lowering operations.

Innovation Solution

A lifting device with a stationary structure and a movable platform, featuring hinged arms with locking mechanisms that securely position the pads in contact with the vehicle, preventing unintended rotation and ensuring stable interaction with the vehicle's surface, while allowing for flexible adjustment and compliance with safety regulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If hinged arms are provided to allow selective rotation for positioning pads, then the flexibility and adaptability of the lifting device is enhanced, but the arms are subjected to unexpected rotation from external forces causing instability and safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arm transitions from a static hinged connection to a dynamic locked connection. The locking mechanism allows the arm to be rotated to different positions during operation, then securely locked in place to prevent unintended movement. This dynamic transition between movable and fixed states resolves the contradiction by providing both flexibility during positioning and stability during lifting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is engaged before the lifting operation begins, preliminarily securing the arm in the desired position. This preliminary action prevents unexpected rotation during the lifting process, ensuring stability while maintaining the ability to adjust positions beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the arms are hinged to allow rotation for positioning, then the operator can adjust the final position of individual arms, but the degree of freedom gives rise to unstable contact between the vehicle bottom and pad

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoidcontact stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The arm connection transitions from a continuously movable hinged joint to a dynamically controlled joint that is locked in position. The locking mechanism maintains the arm at a fixed angle relative to the platform, ensuring stable contact between the pad and vehicle bottom while still allowing adjustment to different positions when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism acts as an intermediary between the hinged arm and the platform. It mediates the conflict between needing rotational freedom for positioning and requiring stability for safe operation by securing the arm at the desired angle, thereby ensuring stable pad-vehicle contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If locking means are added to prevent unintended arm rotation, then safety and stability are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be self-actuating through the natural movement of the arm. As the arm rotates to its operational position, the locking mechanism automatically engages without requiring additional actuators or complex control systems. This self-service approach maintains safety while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking function is extracted as a separate, dedicated mechanism rather than being integrated into the hinged connection itself. This modular approach allows for a simple, focused locking design that adds minimal complexity while effectively preventing unintended arm rotation and ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3992141B1Device for lifting vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 SPANESI
  • EP3992141B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3992141B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3992141B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A device for lifting vehicles, comprising a stationary structure (2) intended to be supported or anchored on the ground (S) or installed in a recess formed in the floor, a movable structure (4) operatively connected to the stationary structure (2), a plurality of arms (18) having one end (19) hinged to the movable structure (2) and a free end (20) with which a pad element (21) designed to come into contact with the vehicle to be lifted is associated; actuating means (5) designed to selectively lift and lower the movable structure (4) with respect to the stationary structure (2) between two predetermined limit positions; each arm is designed to selectively rotate about a respective substantially vertical hinge axis (Y) between an inactive position and an active position in which the pad element (21) comes into contact with the vehicle. Locking means (29) are provided to promote the selective and automatic locking of a arms (18) in the active position.