Lifting Desk Obstacle Detection Using Current Change Rate Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lifting desk control methods face challenges in accurately detecting obstacles due to low sensitivity and high costs, particularly with methods relying on abrupt current change detection, mechanical sensors, and three-axis acceleration sensors, which can lead to misjudgments and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A lifting desk control method involving a motor drive unit, current detection unit, and arithmetic unit that calculates the current change rate over a set time interval, allowing for accurate obstacle detection without additional sensors and minimizing the influence of normal operating conditions, thereby issuing stopping or retreating instructions based on exceeded thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If abrupt current change detection is used for obstacle detection, then the detection method is simple, but the sensitivity for detecting resistance with smaller force is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method complexityVSAvoidobstacle detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from absolute current value to current change rate (dI/dt). By calculating the rate of change of current over time rather than simply comparing current magnitude, the system achieves higher sensitivity in detecting obstacles with smaller resistance forces while maintaining simple implementation through basic arithmetic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If mechanical sensors such as piezoelectric sensors or springs are used, then obstacle detection accuracy is improved, but mounting requirements increase and manufacturing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidmounting and production ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sensors (piezoelectric sensors, springs) with an electrical detection method based on current change rate monitoring. This substitution eliminates the need for complex mechanical components and their associated mounting requirements, while achieving comparable or superior detection accuracy through electronic measurement of motor current characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If three-axis acceleration sensors are used, then obstacle detection capability is improved, but cost increases and misjudgment occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection capabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the motor's own current characteristics as the detection signal, making the motor itself serve as the sensing element. This self-service approach eliminates the need for additional expensive sensors like three-axis acceleration sensors, reducing system cost while avoiding the misjudgment issues associated with acceleration-based detection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If current magnitude judgment is used, then the detection method is simple, but accurate judgment is difficult due to different service conditions under different working conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method simplicityVSAvoidcurrent judgment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static current magnitude comparison to dynamic current change rate analysis. By monitoring how current changes over time (dI/dt) rather than absolute current values, the system adapts to varying working conditions and service loads, achieving accurate obstacle detection regardless of the specific operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances detection sensitivity and reduces costs by focusing on current change rate rather than current magnitude, providing accurate obstacle detection and preventing false alarms during normal operation, while also protecting against overcurrent conditions.

Implementation Method 1

detecting current a at a current time t1 and current b at a time t2 after the current time by a current detection unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical current detection: Ohmmeter

Data Source

PatentUS10579030B2Lifting desk control method
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 FLEXISPOT INC
  • US10579030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a lifting desk control method including a motor drive unit, a current detection unit and an arithmetic unit. The control method comprises the steps of: detecting current a at the current time t1 and current b at time t2; calculating the current change rate L=(b−a)/(t2−t1); and comparing L with a set value, judging that an obstacle is encountered if the set value is exceeded, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to a motor by the motor drive unit. The scheme employed by the invention is to calculate the change rate of current, so judgment is made with higher accuracy and whether an obstacle is encountered is judged with high sensitivity.