Lifting table stand

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lifting table stands are limited in customization, as actuation modules are pre-assembled at the factory, restricting user choice and adaptability to different needs.

Innovation Solution

A lifting table stand design featuring telescopic columns, a carrier, an actuation module, and a passive mechanism, allowing for quick installation and removal of various actuation modules, including electric motors and manual mechanisms, to facilitate user customization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If actuation modules are pre-assembled at the factory, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly precisionVSAvoidadaptability to different actuation modules
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting table stand is divided into modular components: a standardized base structure with mounting interfaces, and separate interchangeable actuation modules. The beam includes standardized receiving members that can accept different actuation module types (electric motors, manual cranks, control boxes) without requiring custom assembly at the factory, thus maintaining manufacturing precision while enabling user adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base structure is designed with universal mounting interfaces and standardized receiving members on the beam that can accommodate multiple types of actuation modules. This universal design allows a single base structure to support various actuation module types (electric, manual, wireless-controlled), resolving the contradiction between standardized manufacturing and user customization needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If actuation modules are fixed at the factory, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidease of customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static, fixed configuration to a dynamic, reconfigurable system. The receiving members on the beam are designed to accept and release different actuation module types through simple attachment mechanisms, allowing users to easily change the system configuration based on their needs without complex reassembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Standardized receiving members act as intermediaries between the base structure and various actuation modules. These receiving members provide a standardized interface that simplifies the connection process, allowing users to easily attach or detach different module types without dealing with the complexity of direct integration into the base structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple actuation module types are supported, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different actuation modulesVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base structure and beam are designed with universal mounting interfaces and standardized receiving members that can accommodate multiple types of actuation modules (electric motors, manual cranks, wireless-controlled modules). This universal design enables compatibility with different module types without requiring multiple specialized base structures, thus improving adaptability while controlling structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses standardized interface parameters (mounting hole patterns, connection mechanisms, mounting positions) that remain constant across different actuation module types. By maintaining consistent interface parameters while allowing variation in actuation mechanism parameters, the system achieves multi-type compatibility without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables universal applicability and easy replacement of actuation modules, reducing production costs and user expenditure, while providing adaptable height adjustment options.

Implementation Method 1

The passive mechanism includes a transmission shaft and a pair of gear sets, and the gear sets are arranged in the inner tubes respectively, and the transmission shaft passes the driver and is connected to each gear set

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Data Source

PatentUS11596221B2Lifting table stand
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 TIMOTION TECH CO LTD
  • US11596221B2 patent drawing
  • US11596221B2 patent drawing
  • US11596221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lifting table stand includes a pair of telescopic columns, a carrier, an actuation module and a passive mechanism. Each telescopic column includes multiple tubes adapted to sheathe with each other and move telescopically relative to each other. The carrier includes a beam straddling the telescopic columns and a pair of support members perpendicularly connected to two ends of the beam. The actuation module includes a receiving member detachably installed to the beam and a driver connected to the receiving member. The passive mechanism includes a transmission shaft and a pair of gear sets installed in the tubes. The transmission shaft passes the driver and is connected to each gear set. Since the receiving member is detachably installed to beam, the actuation module may be changed to different types to control the elevation of the lifting table stand.