Orthodontic Ligating Member Retention Force Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional self-ligating orthodontic brackets experience a significant reduction in retention force after a limited number of opening and closing cycles, leading to inefficiency and potential disengagement of the archwire, due to excessive wear and misuse by patients.

Innovation Solution

A ligating member with an improved geometry, featuring a latching element and offset ligation fingers, is designed to maintain effective retention force over a greater number of cycles, utilizing materials like 17-4 stainless steel and incorporating a guide and stiffener for enhanced durability and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a conventional ligating slide is designed to optimize retention force for a short life-cycle, then the retention force is high initially, but the retention force reduces significantly after a limited number of opening/closing cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention forceVSAvoidnumber of opening/closing cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the latching element, specifically the ratio between the deflection length (L1) and the distance from the tip to the narrowest region (L2), where L2/L1 is between 0.40 and 0.60. This parameter optimization allows the latching element to maintain consistent retention force over thousands of cycles by distributing stress more effectively during repeated opening and closing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The latching element is designed with specific dynamic characteristics including a deflection length L1 of at least 0.020 inches and a narrowest region with cross-sectional dimensions of no more than 0.010 inches by 0.020 inches. These dynamic properties enable the element to flex and return reliably through thousands of cycles while maintaining retention force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the ligating slide is cycled multiple times during treatment or if patients play with the bracket, then the retention force decreases, but the structure becomes more durable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention force consistencyVSAvoidligating member structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a specific narrowest region in the latching element with precise cross-sectional dimensions (no more than 0.010 inches by 0.020 inches) located at a specific position (L2 distance from the tip). This localized geometric feature concentrates the flexing action at the optimal point, allowing the rest of the structure to remain simple while achieving reliable performance through thousands of cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the retention force becomes too low, then the ligating member can be operated easily, but the archwire may disengage from the bracket

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveligating member operationVSAvoidarchwire retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The latching element is pre-designed with specific geometric parameters (deflection length L1 ≥ 0.020 inches, narrowest region dimensions ≤ 0.010 inches by 0.020 inches, and L2/L1 ratio between 0.40 and 0.60) that establish the optimal balance between ease of operation and archwire retention before the bracket is even used. This preliminary optimization ensures reliable performance throughout the intended lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved ligating member maintains consistent retention force, reducing the likelihood of archwire disengagement and extending the lifespan of the orthodontic bracket, while allowing for efficient tooth movement and reduced treatment time.

Implementation Method 1

The latching element includes a head portion and a neck portion extending from the base. The neck portion has a deflection length (L1) measuring at least 0.020 inches and a narrowest region having cross-sectional dimensions of no more than 0.010 inches by 0.020 inches. The ratio (L2/L1) of the distance (L2) from the tip of the latching element to the narrowest region of the neck portion to the deflection length (L1) is between 0.40 and 0.60.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3600133B1Self-ligating bracket having a ligating member
Publication Date: 2023.07.12 WORLD CLASS TECHNOLOGY CORP
  • EP3600133B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3600133B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3600133B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A ligating member (400) operable to retain an archwire (700) within a slot (26) of an orthodontic bracket (10) or buccal tube, including a base (402), a first ligation finger (410) extending from the base, a second ligation finger (412) extending from the base, and a latching element (404) extending from the base between the first ligation finger and the second ligation finger. The latching element includes a neck portion (408) extending from the base, the neck portion having a minimum cross-section region, and a head portion (406) extending from the neck portion, the head portion including a protrusion (416). The ligating member has a length, L1, from the base to a centerline of the protrusion, and a length, L2, from a centerline of the minimum cross-section region to the centerline of the protrusion, wherein L2 is equal to or greater than 40% of L1.