Light Curtain Reflection Layout for Shuttle Contour Detection Failures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fulfillment centers face inefficiencies in processing and transporting orders due to large volumes and complex logistics, including issues with light curtain contour detection failures that lead to unnecessary stops and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

Implementing reflective components to prevent light curtain contour detection failures, allowing shuttles to accurately navigate and maintain high throughput by ensuring accurate obstacle detection and preventing false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If light curtain sensors are used for obstacle detection, then safety is improved, but false detections occur due to contour detection failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidcontour detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between the light curtain sensor and the control system. This intermediary analyzes the raw sensor data, identifies contour detection failures through pattern recognition, and filters out false obstacle signals before they trigger unnecessary stops, thereby maintaining safety while reducing false detections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the outcome of obstacle detection is continuously monitored and fed back to refine the detection algorithm. When false detections are identified, the system adjusts its detection parameters and contour recognition criteria to prevent similar errors in the future, improving both reliability and measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual intervention is implemented for false alarm verification, then detection accuracy is improved, but throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification through automated algorithms that analyze detection patterns, compare against known false alarm signatures, and independently filter out false positives. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual verification while maintaining high detection accuracy, thus preserving throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual verification processes with automated computational systems including machine learning models and pattern recognition algorithms. This substitution eliminates human intervention in the verification process while maintaining or improving detection accuracy, thereby preventing throughput reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If light curtain sensors are positioned close to the shuttle, then detection speed is improved, but false detections from floor tape increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the treatment of different detection zones. The system identifies characteristics specific to floor tape reflections versus actual obstacles, and applies zone-specific filtering criteria. This allows the sensor to maintain close positioning for fast detection while selectively ignoring harmful reflections from floor tape in specific locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances processing speed and efficiency in fulfillment centers by reducing manual intervention and improving the performance of mechanical equipment, leading to increased throughput and streamlined logistics operations.

Implementation Method 1

a reflective component disposed at one or more ends of the autonomous shuttle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11887049B1Systems and methods for light curtain contour detection failure compensation
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11887049B1 patent drawing
  • US11887049B1 patent drawing
  • US11887049B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for light curtain contour detection failure compensation. In one embodiment, an example carrier may include a first base portion, a second base portion, and a platform disposed between the first base portion and the second base portion, where the platform is configured to support a first rollable cart and a second rollable cart. Some embodiments include a frame and a first light curtain assembly coupled to the frame on a first side of the carrier. The shuttle may include a first reflective component removably coupled to the first base portion on the first side of the carrier, and a second reflective component removably coupled to the second base portion on the first side of the carrier, where the first reflective component and the second reflective component are configured to reflect light emitted by the light curtain assembly.