Vehicle Light Indicator Label Correction for Autonomous Driving AI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face challenges in accurately detecting light indicators on vehicles, leading to incorrect predictions that can affect vehicle control, due to insufficient or inaccurate labeling of images used for training machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for labeling images by obtaining vehicle images, identifying vehicle positions, displaying graphical indicia, and receiving user inputs to correct light indicator status, specifically focusing on brake lights and turn signals, to improve the accuracy of machine learning models used in autonomous driving systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If images are obtained from autonomous driving systems for training machine learning models, then the quantity of training data is increased, but the accuracy of light indicator detection remains insufficient due to improper determination by the autonomous driving system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of training imagesVSAvoidaccuracy of light indicator detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where autonomous driving systems send images with improper light indicator determinations to a server. The server then provides corrected labels back to the autonomous driving systems, creating a closed-loop feedback system that continuously improves detection accuracy while utilizing the existing data infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous driving systems automatically identify and flag their own improper determinations, sending these self-identified problematic images to the server for correction. This self-service approach allows the system to automatically generate training data from its own errors without requiring external intervention for data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning models are trained with large quantities of images, then the model's generalization capability is improved, but the reliability of light indicator detection is reduced due to inaccurate labeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization capability of machine learning modelVSAvoidreliability of light indicator detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The server acts as an intermediary between autonomous driving systems, receiving improperly determined images and providing corrected labels. This intermediary ensures that training data is both diverse (maintaining generalization) and accurately labeled (maintaining reliability) by centralizing the correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary correction of light indicator labels before the images are used for training the machine learning model. By pre-correcting the labels on the server side, the model receives high-quality training data that maintains both diversity for generalization and accuracy for reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If autonomous driving systems detect light indicators on vehicles, then vehicle control decisions are enabled, but false predictions occur leading to incorrect control actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy of vehicle control decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary correction of light indicator detection errors before the autonomous driving system makes control decisions. By pre-training the machine learning model with corrected labels, the system reduces false predictions and improves the reliability of subsequent control actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where control decisions and their outcomes are monitored. When improper determinations are detected, the system sends images to the server for correction and uses this feedback to continuously improve the accuracy of future control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250356636A1Systems and methods for labeling images for training machine learning model
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 TESLA INC
  • US20250356636A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356636A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356636A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to systems and methods to train a machine learning model used for autonomous driving. The system includes a plurality of vehicles configured to capture at least the front surrounding view of the vehicle, a machine learning training system, and a verification computing device. The machine learning training system is configured to receive the captured images from the vehicles. The verification computing device is configured to verify whether the machine learning model correctly identified the light indicator of vehicles shown in the captured image. The verification device may determine a disagreement between the vehicle's predicted light indicator and the correct light indicator. In determining that at least one vehicle has a disagreement, the verification computing device is configured to modify the light indicator label and correct label. Then, the modified label can be fed into the machine learning model and used for training the machine learning model.