Lighting Intensity via Low-Refractive Diffusers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Decorative lighting often relies on expensive, highly refractive materials for color separation, while less-refractive materials are less expensive but lack the necessary refractive capability, making them undesirable for lighting applications.

Innovation Solution

The use of a light-transmitting body with a diffusing element, including spherical or spheroidal grains with refractive material, which scatters and disperses light to enhance lighting intensity and color separation, utilizing a combination of incoherent and coherent light sources and dichroic properties to achieve improved light distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If highly refractive materials are used for color separation, then lighting performance is improved, but cost and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting intensityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the refractive index parameter of the material from high to low, using materials with refractive indices between 1.33 and 1.70 (such as water, alcohol, or air) instead of traditional high-refractive-index materials. This parameter change maintains adequate color separation performance while dramatically reducing manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite structures combining low-refractive-index materials with specific geometric configurations (prisms, gratings, or diffuser elements) to achieve the desired optical performance. This composite approach allows the system to compensate for lower individual material refractivity through structural design, maintaining lighting performance without requiring expensive high-refractive-index materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Illumination intensity

If highly refractive materials are used for color separation, then color separation performance is improved, but material cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor separation performanceVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the material selection parameter from high-refractive-index materials to low-refractive-index materials (n=1.33-1.70), using common, inexpensive substances like water, alcohol, or air. This parameter change demonstrates that adequate color separation can be achieved with low-cost materials when combined with appropriate optical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adopts inexpensive materials that can be easily replaced or modified, such as liquid crystals, gels, or aerosols, which are far cheaper than traditional high-refractive-index optical materials. These materials provide sufficient color separation performance for decorative lighting applications without the high cost associated with premium optical materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If less-refractive materials are used, then cost is reduced, but refractive capability and lighting performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidrefractive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates composite optical systems where low-refractive-index materials are combined with structured elements (prisms, gratings, diffusers) to achieve the necessary light manipulation. The structural components compensate for the lower material refractivity, maintaining adequate color separation and lighting performance while using inexpensive materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from relying solely on material properties (refractive index) to incorporating geometric and structural dimensions (prism angles, grating periods, diffuser patterns). This dimensional approach allows the system to achieve optical performance through shape and structure rather than material composition, enabling the use of low-cost materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances lighting intensity and color separation, providing a cost-effective solution for decorative lighting that rivals the performance of more expensive, highly refractive materials.

Implementation Method 1

spherical or spheroidal grains with refractive material, which scatters and disperses light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

spherical or spheroidal grains with refractive material, which scatters and disperses light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

utilizing a combination of incoherent and coherent light sources and dichroic properties to achieve improved light distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDichroism: Dichroic Filter

Data Source

PatentUS12078337B2Enhanced lighting
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 WANGS ALLIANCE CORP
  • US12078337B2 patent drawing
  • US12078337B2 patent drawing
  • US12078337B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for enhanced lighting. The apparatus may include a light-transmitting body. The apparatus may include a light projector. The projector may be configured to propagate into the light-transmitting body an incoming incoherent light. The projector may be configured to propagate into the light-transmitting body an incoming visible coherent light. Emerging coherent light within a visible wavelength rage attributable to the incoming visible coherent light may have a first intensity. The first intensity may be greater than a second intensity. The second intensity may be an intensity of any emerging coherent light that is within the wavelength range and is attributable to the incoming incoherent light. Emerging light may be light that emerges from the light-transmitting body.