Light Liquid Separation Device with Segmented Chamber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional light liquid separating devices for rainwater management are expensive, complex, and unsuitable for large-scale use due to their quasi-stationary design requiring large settling volumes and complex spiral shapes, leading to inefficient removal of light liquids like oil and petrol from wastewater, resulting in groundwater contamination.

Innovation Solution

A light liquid separating device with a simple, space-saving design featuring a light liquid separating pipe with a flow space and a separate light liquid separation chamber connected via passage openings, allowing light liquids to rise and be retained without flowing through the waste water, utilizing a counter-slope and overflow wall to ensure effective separation and retention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional quasi-stationary light liquid separating devices are used, then light liquid separation is achieved, but very large containers are required leading to high costs and limited scalability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight liquid separation efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the separation process into two distinct segments: a flow chamber for wastewater passage and a separate light liquid separation chamber for accumulation. This segmentation allows the main container to remain compact while the separation chamber handles the accumulation function, resolving the contradiction between separation efficiency and container size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The light liquid separation chamber is extracted as a distinct functional component connected via passage openings rather than being integrated into the main flow path. This extraction allows the separation function to be performed in a dedicated space while keeping the overall device compact and suitable for large-scale deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If conventional spiral-shaped separating devices are used, then light liquid removal is achieved, but the design becomes complex and expensive making large-scale use unsuitable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight liquid removal efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses simple geometric shapes (cylindrical flow chamber and spherical separation chamber) connected by passage openings, avoiding complex spiral geometries. The segmentation of functions into distinct chambers maintains separation efficiency while dramatically reducing structural complexity and manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex spiral paths to achieve separation, the invention inverts the approach by using simple cylindrical and spherical chambers with passage openings. The separation occurs naturally through density differences in the simplified geometry, eliminating the need for complex spiral structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If large settling volumes are provided for effective separation, then light liquid separation improves, but installation space requirements increase and costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation effectivenessVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The separation chamber is segmented as a distinct spherical component with controlled volume, connected to the main flow chamber through passage openings. This allows the settling volume to be optimized for separation effectiveness while being spatially separated from the flow path, reducing overall installation footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spherical separation chamber provides localized settling volume specifically where needed for light liquid accumulation, while the main cylindrical flow chamber maintains compact dimensions for flow handling. This local quality optimization ensures effective separation without requiring the entire device to be large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cost-effective, efficient removal of light liquids with reduced installation space and operational complexity, allowing for widespread use in rainwater management systems, particularly suitable for areas like streets and parking lots, while maintaining high flow speeds and using the coalescence effect for enhanced separation.

Implementation Method 1

at least part of the light liquid continues to flow through the at least one flow space due to the compared to the rest of the waste water lower specific density of the light liquid rises to the top

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity difference (buoyancy): Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

These very small light liquid particles then flow together on the net by the so-called coalescence effect and form larger light liquid droplets, which experience greater buoyancy and can therefore rise to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoalescence effect: Coagulation

Data Source

PatentEP2226106B1Light fluid separation device
Publication Date: 2015.09.02 FRANKISCHE ROHRWERKE GEBR KIRCHNER GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2226106B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The light fluid separation device (10) comprises a light fluid separation tube (11) that has a flow chamber (11c), where the light fluid rises up due to the lower specific density. The flow chamber is connected to a light fluid separation chamber (11d), where the light fluid is separated.