Light-Shading Material Surface Roughness Anti-Reflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing light-shading materials for optical devices face challenges in miniaturization and thinning, requiring improved anti-reflection performance, simplicity in manufacturing, and excellent adhesion between layers, while maintaining hardness and durability.

Innovation Solution

A light-shading material with a specific surface roughness profile, characterized by an arithmetical mean deviation of 0.5 μm or more and a difference between maximum profile peak height and valley depth of less than 3, featuring a base film with a Light-shading layer that has a thickness of 2 μm to 35 μm, and a surface hardness of H or more, achieved through controlled particle size, distribution, and film thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a thick film fixed layer is provided to improve Light-shading property, then anti-reflection performance is improved, but device thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-reflection performanceVSAvoidfilm thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the surface roughness parameters (Ra≥0.5μm and Rp-Rv<3) of the Light-shading layer to achieve excellent anti-reflection performance with a reduced film thickness of 15μm or less, resolving the contradiction between anti-reflection performance and film thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates local surface unevenness with specific roughness characteristics (Ra≥0.5μm, Rp-Rv<3) in the Light-shading layer to scatter light effectively, achieving good anti-reflection performance without increasing overall film thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If black pigment concentration varies in thickness direction to improve Light-shading property, then anti-reflection performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-reflection performanceVSAvoidpreparation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes from varying pigment concentration in the thickness direction to controlling surface roughness parameters (Ra≥0.5μm and Rp-Rv<3), simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining excellent anti-reflection performance with a single Light-shading layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the light scattering function from the pigment concentration gradient and transfers it to surface roughness control, eliminating the need for complex multi-layer structures or varying concentration profiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Volume of moving object

If device is miniaturized and thinned, then device size is reduced, but adhesion between layers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidadhesion between layers
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the surface roughness parameters (Ra≥0.5μm and Rp-Rv<3) of the Light-shading layer to enhance mechanical interlocking and adhesion strength, enabling reliable performance in miniaturized devices with reduced overall thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The material exhibits excellent anti-reflection properties, maintains performance in thin and miniaturized optical devices, and can be produced with a simple process, ensuring long-term effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

a Light-shading layer which roughens the surface is provided... the arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed profile Ra of the surface is 0.5 μm or more... the difference (Rp−Rv) between the maximum profile peak height Rp and the maximum profile valley depth Rv is less than 3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS11125917B2Light-shading material for optical device
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 SOMAR CORP
  • US11125917B2 patent drawing
  • US11125917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A light-shading member for an optical device which has excellent reflection preventing performance can be manufactured by a simple process and can be applied to an optical device which is small and thin. Based on JIS B0601: 2001, the arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed profile Ra of the surface of the light-shading member for an optical device is 0.5 μm or more, and the difference (Rp-Rv) between the maximum profile peak height Rp and the maximum profile valley depth Rv is less than 3. The light-shading member for an optical device preferably has a substrate film and a light-shading layer. The light-shading layer is formed on at least one surface of the substrate film. Further, the light-shading layer has an average film thickness of 2 μm-35 μm.