Liquefied Gas Lighter Membrane Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquefied gas lighters with non-adjustable flame height face challenges in manufacturing cost and membrane robustness due to complex designs and high costs, particularly when dealing with dynamic surges and liquid phase gas flow rate variations.

Innovation Solution

A simpler design where the liquefied gas reaches the membrane directly through through holes in the first seating body, with a defined passage area by the intersection of the first and second seating bodies, reducing the risk of membrane breakage and ensuring a constant gas flow rate by minimizing the liquid's volume near the membrane and promoting evaporation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a labyrinth path is provided for the liquefied gas route between the reservoir and the membrane, then the dynamic surge on the membrane is minimized, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane breakage preventionVSAvoidgas passage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gas passage is segmented into multiple functional zones: a first gas passage with larger cross-section for bulk gas flow, a second gas passage with restricted cross-section for flow rate control, and a third gas passage for stabilized gas delivery to the burner. This segmentation allows dynamic surge minimization through progressive flow restriction without requiring a complex labyrinth path, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining membrane protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the first seating body has an elongated cylindrical shape with a longitudinal peripheral groove and annular pool, then the dynamic surge on the membrane is reduced, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane breakage preventionVSAvoidseating body geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful function of the annular pool (causing liquid accumulation and increasing manufacturing complexity) is extracted and removed. Instead, a simplified first seating body with a longitudinal groove is provided, where the groove directly guides gas flow without creating a pooled accumulation zone. This maintains the surge-minimization function while dramatically improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If the lighter is in horizontal position allowing liquid gas to accumulate downstream of the membrane, then the gas outlet flow rate increases considerably, but the flame height becomes dangerous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow rateVSAvoidexcessive flame height
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A gas flow rate limiting device consisting of a microporous membrane is installed upstream of the membrane to pre-regulate the gas flow rate before the gas reaches the membrane and burner. This preliminary flow rate limitation ensures that even if liquid gas accumulates downstream during horizontal positioning, the gas outlet flow rate remains controlled and the flame height stays within safe limits, preventing the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design results in a more robust, cost-effective lighter with a stable gas flow rate, reducing the risk of membrane breakage and excessive flame height during dynamic surges and liquid phase gas exposure.

Implementation Method 1

The liquefied gas from the reservoir reaches the membrane on said upstream face, diffuses into the microporous material of the membrane and leaves it via said downstream face towards said supply duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

a gas flow rate limiting device consisting of a microporous membrane gripped between a first seating body and a second seating body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

the gas outlet flow rate can be considerably greater during a short transitory period, until the gas in liquid state, near the membrane, has evaporated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP2017532B1Liquefied gas lighter with non-adjustable flame height
Publication Date: 2016.10.05 FLAMAGAS
  • EP2017532B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2017532B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2017532B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Liquated gas lighter with non-adjustable flame height, comprising a gas reservoir (12), a burner (1) and a gas flow limiting device consisting of a microporous membrane (2) gripped between a first seating body (3) and a second seating body (4). First seating body (3) has a through hole (17) that comes out on one side directly into microporous membrane (2) and on the other side into reservoir (12). Second seating body (4) has a seating surface (22) in contact with membrane (2), a groove (6) formed in seating surface (22), an outlet duct (7) and a linking passage (18) between groove (6) and outlet duct (7). Through hole (17) is facing, at least partially and through microporous membrane (2), groove (6).