Outdoor Lighting Network Management Across Proprietary Protocols
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing outdoor lighting networks (OLNs) often require multiple proprietary control and communication protocols, forcing customers to use a single vendor or maintain separate systems for management, which is inefficient and costly due to the complexity of integrating multiple vendor-specific features and capabilities.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that enable communication between a single Central Management System (CMS) and multiple unique outdoor lighting networks, using a common protocol stack for CMS communication and vendor-specific protocol stacks for vendor management systems, allowing for unified management and configuration of lighting networks from different vendors.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If a single CMS is used to manage multiple outdoor lighting networks from different vendors, then unified management and reduced operational complexity are achieved, but interoperability issues arise due to proprietary control and communication protocols from different vendors
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a standard communication interface layer that acts as an intermediary between the single CMS and multiple vendor-specific lighting networks. This interface layer translates proprietary vendor protocols into standardized commands, enabling unified management without requiring the CMS to directly support each vendor's proprietary protocol. The interface layer mediates communication, resolving the contradiction between simplified management and protocol compatibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The CMS is designed with universal functionality to manage multiple outdoor lighting networks from different vendors through a single unified interface. The system implements vendor-agnostic control capabilities that can adapt to various proprietary protocols, allowing one CMS to perform the function of multiple vendor-specific management systems. This universality resolves the contradiction by enabling single-system management while maintaining compatibility with diverse vendor protocols.
2Adaptability or versatility
If fully customized control and communication protocols are developed between a single CMS and each proprietary OLN implementation, then complete control over all functionalities and capabilities is achieved, but integration effort and expense increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the control system into two distinct layers: a standardized upper layer (CMS interface) and vendor-specific lower layers (protocol adapters). This segmentation allows the CMS to maintain universal control capabilities through standard interfaces while delegating vendor-specific protocol handling to separate adapter components. The segmentation reduces integration effort by isolating proprietary protocol complexity into manageable, independent modules rather than requiring full customization throughout the entire system.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs intermediary adapter layers that translate between standardized CMS commands and vendor-specific proprietary protocols. These intermediaries enable complete control over vendor-specific functionalities without requiring the CMS itself to be fully customized for each vendor. The adapters act as buffer zones that preserve control capability while minimizing integration effort by confining vendor-specific complexity to isolated translation layers.
3Adaptability or versatility
If a unified CMS supports and manages the entirety of different features and capabilities across multiple proprietary OLN implementations, then comprehensive management is achieved, but the CMS becomes burdensome to operate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary abstraction layer that shields operators from vendor-specific complexity while providing access to comprehensive features. This interface layer presents a unified, simplified command structure to operators while handling complex vendor-specific protocol translations in the background. The intermediary enables comprehensive feature coverage across multiple proprietary systems without exposing operational complexity to the user, thus reducing operational burden while maintaining adaptability.
Solution Approach 2:
The CMS implements universal operational interfaces that provide consistent control mechanisms for managing diverse lighting network features. Rather than requiring operators to learn multiple vendor-specific interfaces, the system offers unified universal controls that work across all connected networks. This universality maintains comprehensive feature coverage while significantly easing operation by presenting a single consistent interface paradigm regardless of the underlying vendor-specific capabilities.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Inventive methods and apparatus for management of outdoor lighting networks (130A-C, 230A-C). For example, in some embodiments methods and apparatus are provided that enable communication between a central management system (110, 210) and a plurality of unique outdoor lighting networks (130A-C, 230A-C).