Lighting Unit Grouping for Adaptive Headlight Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for detecting continuous street lighting, essential for adaptive high-beam assistants, struggle to accurately differentiate between built-up areas and localized illuminated regions like pedestrian crossings or traffic lights, leading to premature dimming or false positives.
Innovation Solution
A method that groups adjacently arranged lighting units based on distance and time thresholds, allowing for earlier detection of continuous street lighting by considering multiple units as a single entity, reducing errors in evaluation and improving reaction time.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If multiple lighting units are detected and evaluated individually, then the detection accuracy of continuous street lighting is improved, but the probability of false positives increases due to localized illuminated regions being misidentified
Solution Approach 1:
The patent groups adjacently arranged lighting units into a single lighting cluster when they meet specific spatial and temporal criteria. Instead of evaluating each lighting unit independently, the system combines multiple units into one cluster entity, which prevents localized illuminated regions (like pedestrian crossings or traffic lights) from being misidentified as continuous street lighting. This merging approach maintains detection accuracy while significantly reducing false positives.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary grouping of lighting units into clusters before evaluating whether continuous street lighting is present. By pre-organizing lighting units into spatial-temporal clusters based on distance and time thresholds, the evaluation process can work with consolidated cluster data rather than individual units, improving both accuracy and reliability in the subsequent detection phase.
2Reliability
If the detection system waits for multiple lighting units to be confirmed, then the reliability of city detection is improved, but the reaction time increases causing delayed dimming
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary grouping of lighting units into clusters based on spatial and temporal criteria before the final evaluation of continuous street lighting. This pre-processing step organizes lighting data into meaningful clusters, allowing the system to make reliable detection decisions more quickly by evaluating cluster patterns rather than individual units, thus reducing reaction time without sacrificing reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The grouping criteria for lighting units are dynamic and adaptable. The system uses distance thresholds and time thresholds that can be adjusted based on vehicle speed and other contextual factors. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high detection reliability while adapting its confirmation requirements to current driving conditions, thereby optimizing reaction time across different scenarios.
3Reliability
If lighting units are grouped into clusters, then the false positive rate is reduced, but the device complexity increases due to additional grouping logic
Solution Approach 1:
The detection system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a grouping module that clusters lighting units based on spatial-temporal criteria, and an evaluation module that assesses continuous street lighting based on cluster patterns. This segmentation allows the complex grouping logic to be isolated and managed separately, reducing the apparent complexity in the overall system architecture while maintaining high reliability through specialized processing in each module.
Solution Approach 2:
The system manages complexity by utilizing parameter-based grouping criteria (distance threshold, time threshold, spatial arrangement) that can be adjusted without changing the core grouping logic. By changing parameters rather than restructuring the grouping algorithm, the system maintains simplicity in its core logic while adapting to different operating conditions, thus reducing false positives without proportionally increasing device complexity.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5~6
AI summary
The invention relates to a method (200) for determining a group (138) of at least two adjacent lighting units (125a, 125b) during the travel of a vehicle (100). The method (200) comprises a step of recognizing (210) at least one first (125a) and at least one second (125b) lighting unit in a detection region (120) of a sensor (110) and recognizing a subsequent exiting of the first lighting unit (125a) out of the detection region (120) of the sensor (110). The method (200) further comprises a step of detecting (220) a section and/or a time that the vehicle (100) travels after the first lighting unit (125a) exits the detection region (120) of the sensor (110) until the second lighting unit (125b) exits the detection region (120) of the sensor (110). Finally, the method (200) according to the invention comprises a step of grouping (230) the first (125a) and second (125b) lighting units into the group (138) of at least two adjacent lighting units if the section has a predetermined relationship to a section threshold (400) and/or if the time has a predetermined relationship to a time threshold.