Lightning Forecasting via Adaptive Relational Operator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current weather prediction systems face challenges in accurately forecasting lightning strikes, as they often rely on assumptions that lead to noise in reflectivity and lightning discharge data, resulting in less accurate forecasts.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a computing device to derive a customizable relational operator by integrating radar reflectivity and lightning discharge data, selecting a regularization operator and weighting term, and applying these to forecasted radar data to predict lightning activity, allowing for updates based on additional data to refine the forecast.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional weather prediction systems use assumptions to forecast lightning strikes, then the forecasting process is simplified, but the accuracy of lightning strike forecasting deteriorates due to noise in reflectivity and lightning discharge data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecasting process complexityVSAvoidlightning strike forecasting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously updates the relational operator by incorporating additional radar reflectivity data and lightning discharge data as they become available. This feedback mechanism allows the model to adapt to changing storm conditions and refine its lightning strike forecasts in real-time, improving accuracy without requiring overly complex preprocessing assumptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the relational operator parameters based on the specific characteristics of each storm system. By customizing the operator for individual storms rather than using fixed assumptions, the system achieves high forecasting accuracy while maintaining a relatively simple overall framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a customizable relational operator is derived using regularization operator and weighting term, then the forecasting accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelightning strike forecasting accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary derivation of the relational operator during a setup phase using initial radar and lightning data. This pre-computed operator is then applied to forecast future lightning activity, separating the complex computational work from the real-time forecasting operation and reducing ongoing computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically selects and optimizes the regularization operator and weighting term based on the input data characteristics without requiring manual intervention. The grid search approach autonomously identifies optimal parameters, reducing the need for complex user configuration while maintaining high forecasting accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If additional radar and lightning data are continuously received and used to revise the relational operator, then the forecasting reliability improves, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecasting reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes additional data at periodic intervals rather than continuously, updating the relational operator at scheduled times. This periodic approach maintains forecasting reliability by incorporating new information while avoiding the excessive computational burden of continuous real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system selectively processes only the most critical additional data that significantly impacts forecast accuracy, rather than processing all available data equally. This partial processing approach maintains reliability by focusing on key information while reducing overall data processing time and resource requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10359543B2Forecasting lightning activity
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 VAISALA
  • US10359543B2 patent drawing
  • US10359543B2 patent drawing
  • US10359543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for forecasting lightning activity. Such a method may include obtaining radar reflectivity data from a radar detection device for multiple altitudes over an environmental region for a past period of time, and dividing the reflectivity data into multiple sub-regions within the region. The method may also include obtaining lightning discharge data for the environmental region from a lightning discharge detecting device for a past period of time, and establishing a customizable mathematical operator based on the radar reflectivity data and the lightning discharge data. The method may additionally include receiving forecast radar data for at least one of the sub-region for a future time period, and forecasting a probability of lightning strikes in at least one of the sub-regions based on applying the customizable mathematical operator to the forecast radar data.