Lightning Shielding Failure Risk Assessment for Transmission Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing lightning shielding failure risk in power transmission lines are inaccurate and do not consider crucial factors like altitude, terrain, and lightning strike angle, making it difficult to identify and mitigate tripping risks effectively.

Innovation Solution

A multi-dimensional analysis method that calculates the lightning shielding failure risk by extracting key parameters such as tower head size, insulation configuration, thunderstorm days, and ground wire protection angle, and applies these to determine a weighted tripping risk for the entire transmission line, considering terrain and altitude corrections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard methods are used to calculate lightning shielding failure probability, then the calculation process is simple, but the accuracy is low and large errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelightning shielding failure probability calculation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces multiple correction parameters including altitude correction factor Ka, terrain correction factor Kt, and lightning strike angle correction factor Kθ. These parameters modify the basic shielding failure probability calculation to account for environmental and geometric variations, thereby improving accuracy without requiring a complete reformulation of the calculation model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional protection angle model to a three-dimensional analysis by incorporating lightning strike angle θ and terrain inclination angle φ. This dimensional expansion allows for more realistic representation of lightning interaction with transmission lines in complex terrain conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If analysis is performed for each tower on the whole transmission line, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but the calculation amount becomes huge and is not feasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewhole line tripping risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidcalculation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transmission line into multiple sections based on terrain characteristics, tower types, and lightning activity zones. Each section is analyzed separately with appropriate correction factors, and results are aggregated to obtain the whole line tripping risk. This segmentation reduces the computational burden compared to analyzing every individual tower while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent focuses analysis on critical sections of the transmission line that have higher vulnerability to lightning shielding failure, such as sections with unfavorable terrain, higher towers, or greater thunderstorm activity. By concentrating computational resources on these high-risk partial sections, the method achieves effective whole line assessment without the excessive calculation required for uniform analysis of all towers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive factors like altitude, terrain, and lightning strike angle are considered, then assessment accuracy improves, but data collection requirements increase and become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelightning shielding failure risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidterrain and environmental data collection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses correction factors as intermediary parameters that translate complex environmental conditions (altitude, terrain, strike angle) into modified probability values. Instead of directly measuring and modeling every environmental variable, the method employs these intermediary correction factors that can be derived from more easily obtainable data, thereby reducing measurement and data collection difficulties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12135346B2Multi-dimensional analysis method for tripping risk of whole transmission line due to lightning shielding failure
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 STATE GRID ZHEJIANG ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TAIZHOU POWER SUPPLY
  • US12135346B2 patent drawing
  • US12135346B2 patent drawing
  • US12135346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a multi-dimensional analysis method for a tripping risk of a whole transmission line due to a lightning shielding failure. A quantity of thunderstorm days, a tower size, a terrain proportion, an altitude, and insulation configuration data are collected for a transmission line for which a tripping risk due to a lightning shielding failure needs to be analyzed, and a striking distance, an exposure distance, a lightning resisting level of the line after altitude factor correction, and a lightning shielding failure risk of a single-base tower are calculated in turn. Characteristics of a lightning shielding failure under different nominal heights, quantities of thunderstorm days, and terrains are studied. Representative combination conditions are selected to calculate a tripping risk of a typical tower due to the lightning shielding failure. A weight coefficient is extracted, to calculate a tripping risk of the whole line due to the lightning shielding failure.