Lightweight adjustable folding ergonomic sit/stand chair with optional methods of construction and integration with ancillary accessories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sit/stand chairs are limited to office and industrial environments due to instability on uneven surfaces, lack of foldability, impracticality for home and recreational use, and poor consideration for weather resistance, weight, portability, cost, and style.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, three-legged ergonomic chair with a unique minimalistic design that provides stable footing on uneven surfaces, is foldable, and features adjustable components for comfort and posture, made from materials like aluminum profiles and reinforced composites, with optional accessories for increased utility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a heavy pedestal base is used to provide ballast and resistance to tipping, then stability is improved, but portability and weight are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The chair is divided into separate components including the seat assembly, base, and backrest that can be easily detached and reattached. This segmentation allows the heavy base to remain stationary for stability while the seat assembly can be removed for portability, resolving the contradiction between stability and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chair incorporates adjustable elements such as height-adjustable seat and backrest positions, allowing the structure to adapt to different user needs and surfaces. The dynamic adjustment capability enables the chair to maintain stability through proper weight distribution rather than relying solely on heavy ballast.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If a flat floor-like platform is used for standing, then ease of manufacture is improved, but stability is worsened when feet are lifted off the platform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The standing platform function is separated from the main seat structure. The chair provides a stable three-legged base for the seat while the user's feet rest on the ground or a separate footrest, rather than requiring a large integrated platform. This segmentation maintains stability while simplifying the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of providing a large flat platform across the entire base, the design provides localized foot support through a compact footrest or allows direct ground contact. This localized approach provides sufficient support for the standing function without requiring a large unstable platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a heavy bulbous base with convex surface is used to enable multi-directional rocking motion, then adaptability is improved, but stability is worsened due to inherent instability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a convex base surface that encourages unstable rocking motion, the design inverts the approach by providing a stable flat base surface and allowing the seat and backrest to rock or adjust independently. This inversion maintains adaptability through seat movement while preserving base stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The chair incorporates dynamic adjustment mechanisms in the seat and backrest that allow movement and adaptation without requiring the entire base to rock. The adjustable components provide versatility while the fixed stable base maintains grounding and prevents excessive instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If existing sit/stand chairs are designed for office and industrial environments, then reliability is improved, but adaptability is worsened for home and recreational use

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The chair is designed with universal appeal and functionality that suits multiple environments including office, home, and recreational settings. Features such as the lightweight foldable construction, adjustable components, and aesthetically pleasing design allow the same chair to reliably serve different purposes and locations, resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The chair incorporates adjustable features that allow it to adapt to different users and environments dynamically. Height adjustments, angle adjustments, and foldable components enable the same reliable chair structure to be customized for various settings from formal office environments to casual home use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Strength

If existing sit/stand chairs are made non-foldable, then strength is improved, but portability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The chair is segmented into modular components connected by strong joints and locking mechanisms. The foldable design maintains structural integrity through reinforced connection points and interlocking elements, allowing the chair to fold compactly for portability while retaining sufficient strength when assembled for use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chair transitions between static and dynamic states - rigid and strong when assembled for use, and compact and portable when folded. The folding mechanism incorporates locking elements that provide structural strength during use while enabling easy folding for transport, dynamically adapting to the operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11633043B2Lightweight adjustable folding ergonomic sit/stand chair with optional methods of construction and integration with ancillary accessories
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 SUTULA JR DANIEL PAUL
  • US11633043B2 patent drawing
  • US11633043B2 patent drawing
  • US11633043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel lightweight, high stability ergonomic chair, enabling sitting, and leaning in a perched intermediary position between sitting and standing. An inclined saddle type seat is supported by three legs. A forward chair leg is located between the feet of, and beneath the center of gravity of the seated person. Two chair legs extend rearward. The chair permits rocking backwards, diagonally forward, and rocking about the forward chair leg. This “active seating” provides for easy transitions between sitting and standing, shifting of weight, and conveys an open positive body language. Multiple embodiments and architectures are disclosed multiple configurations including; rigid, folding, and for quick disassembly. The chairs may be constructed of various rigid and flexible materials, with optional features including; armrests, footrests, caster wheels, cushioning, and a standing desk type work surface. The chair eliminates the need for connection to a base platform beneath the user's feet.