Lightweight Composite Roofing Support for Steep-Roof Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing roofing support systems for steeply pitched roofs are heavy, require time-consuming repositioning, and often damage the roof with fasteners, while polymer blocks are unstable and prone to sliding.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight composite roofing support system with a dual-wedge design and a resilient cover layer that adheres to the roof without fasteners, providing a stable, non-skid platform for workers and materials, adaptable to various roof pitches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional jack stands and jack boards are used to provide a support platform, then a stable working surface is achieved, but the system becomes heavy and requires substantial time and effort for repositioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of working platformVSAvoidweight of support system
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional heavy wood and metal to lightweight closed-cell foam with density of 0.02-0.08 g/cm³, while maintaining structural integrity through geometric design (wedge shape with specific angles) and surface treatments (adhesive layers, textured surfaces)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction combining closed-cell foam core material with adhesive layers and textured surface treatments to achieve both lightweight properties and stable, non-skid working surface characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If jack stands and jack boards are used to create a support platform, then workers can work on pitched roofs, but the system requires anchoring with nails or screws that damage the roof and create leakage paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of platform deploymentVSAvoidroof damage and leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the fastening elements (nails, screws, anchors) from the support system design, replacing them with a friction-based retention mechanism that relies on the wedge shape and adhesive layers to hold the platform in place without penetrating or damaging the roof surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces adhesive layers as an intermediary between the foam support structure and the roof surface, providing attachment without penetration, and textured surfaces as an intermediary to enhance friction and prevent sliding without mechanical fasteners

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Weight of moving object

If polymer roof blocks are used to provide support on pitched roofs, then the system is lightweight, but the blocks are too rigid and unstable, tending to slide downward on steep roofs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of support blocksVSAvoidstability of blocks on roof
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curved or rounded surface treatments to the foam blocks, creating textured surfaces that increase friction and prevent sliding, replacing the flat rigid polymer surfaces that caused instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses asymmetric wedge shapes with specific angles (e.g., 30-60 degree angles) that provide mechanical interlocking with the roof surface and prevent downward sliding, replacing the symmetric rigid blocks that tended to slide

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Adaptability or versatility

If traditional support systems are used on steeply pitched roofs, then workers can access the roof surface, but repositioning the support structures is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to roof surfaceVSAvoidtime for repositioning supports
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the support system into individual modular foam blocks that can be independently positioned and adjusted, allowing workers to quickly reconfigure the platform as needed without moving heavy interconnected structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers a stable, level working surface on steeply pitched roofs without damaging the roof, allowing easy movement and secure placement of workers and materials, reducing installation time and material costs.

Implementation Method 1

a longitudinally-extending resiliently compressible cover layer comprising a resiliently compressible cover material disposed on the first roof contact side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20250257579A1Lightweight composite roofing support system
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 PHIL SQUARED ROOF JACK SYST LLC
  • US20250257579A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257579A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257579A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A lightweight composite roofing support system comprises a longitudinally-extending core member comprising a longitudinally-extending first roof contact side comprising a first edge and opposed second edge, a longitudinally-extending second side comprising a second side working surface having a second width and a second length that is greater than the second width, the second side tapering toward the first edge at a first predetermined acute angle, and a longitudinally-extending third side comprising a third side working surface having a third width and a third length that is greater than the third width, the third side tapering toward the second edge at a second predetermined acute angle that is different than the first predetermined acute angle, a first end comprising an integral first recess defining a first handle, and an opposed second end comprising an integral second recess defining a second handle, the core member comprising a wedge-shaped lateral cross-section.