Lightweight container base

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PET container bases are not optimized for balanced vacuum and pressure response, leading to inefficiencies in material usage and weight, particularly under hot-fill conditions where they must absorb internal and external pressures while maintaining container shape.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a lightweight base configuration with a central pushup portion and strategically positioned straps, which allows for improved vacuum absorption and structural integrity, reducing material usage and weight while maintaining performance under pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If traditional container base design is used, then structural integrity is maintained, but container weight increases and material usage is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidbase structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base is divided into multiple functional zones including a heel region, a pushup portion with inversion portion, and a standing surface region. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function while using minimal material, resolving the contradiction between weight reduction and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the base are given different thicknesses and material densities based on their functional requirements. The heel region has greater thickness for impact absorption, the pushup portion is optimized for vacuum response, and the standing surface is minimized for weight reduction. This local differentiation maintains overall structural integrity while minimizing total material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Weight of moving object

If base material is reduced to minimize weight, then container weight decreases, but ability to absorb vacuum forces and withstand pressure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase weightVSAvoidvacuum and pressure response
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The base incorporates a pushup portion with an inversion portion that can dynamically change shape in response to vacuum forces. During hot filling, the inversion portion pushes up to counteract vacuum. During cooling, it inverts to absorb vacuum forces. This dynamic response allows the lightweight base to maintain reliable vacuum and pressure response without excessive material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The base design changes the physical parameters of the container base by creating a pushup portion that actively changes position and shape under different pressure conditions. This parameter change enables the lightweight structure to achieve the same vacuum and pressure response as heavier traditional bases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If base design is optimized for vacuum absorption, then vacuum response improves, but ability to withstand internal pressure during hot filling deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum absorption capabilityVSAvoidpressure withstanding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The pushup portion dynamically adapts its shape based on pressure conditions. During hot filling, it maintains a pushed-up configuration to withstand internal pressure. During cooling, it inverts to absorb vacuum forces. This dynamic behavior allows a single lightweight structure to excel at both vacuum absorption and pressure withstanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The base is pre-formed with a pushup portion that is positioned to counteract vacuum forces before they occur during hot filling. This preliminary positioning allows the lightweight base to effectively resist vacuum without requiring excessive material, while still maintaining the strength needed for pressure withstanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10532848B2Lightweight container base
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 AMCOR RIGID PACKAGING USA LLC
  • US10532848B2 patent drawing
  • US10532848B2 patent drawing
  • US10532848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container including an opening defined by a finish portion, and a base at an end of the container opposite to the opening. The base includes a standing ring extending inward from a heal to a center pushup portion. The center pushup portion includes an pushup ring surrounding an inversion portion. In an as-blown position the inversion portion extends outward and beyond the pushup ring such that the inversion portion is further from the opening than the pushup ring. In a final position the inversion portion is inverted relative to the as-blown position such that the inversion portion extends inward so as to be closer to the opening than the pushup ring. The inversion portion is mechanically moved from the as-blown position to the filled position with an inversion device after the container has been filled to reduce vacuum or increase pressure within the container.