Lightweight Plastic Container Neck Structure for Stable Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lightweight liquid containers face challenges in maintaining stability while ensuring minimal weight impact, particularly when designed for semi-liquid fluids like yoghurts or milkshakes, and require improved neck structures for secure closure and pouring mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A neck structure for liquid containers comprising a tubular body made of lightweight plastic, featuring a lower support collar, serrated support flange, cylindrical part, and upper washer, designed for secure attachment and manual gripping, with a sealing plug for the pouring orifice.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a neck structure is added to lightweight plastic containers, then stability and closure security are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer stabilityVSAvoidneck structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neck is divided into distinct functional segments: a lower support collar for structural reinforcement and attachment to the gland, a support flange for closure attachment, and an upper washer for sealing. This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function efficiently while maintaining overall simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The neck structure is designed to be axially coupled to the existing container gland, with the lower support collar mating directly with the gland interior. The support flange and upper washer are nested within the tubular body structure, creating a compact integrated assembly that adds functionality without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If a support flange with serrated annular body is used, then manual gripping ease is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual gripping easeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The serrated annular body is applied locally to the support flange portion of the neck that requires manual gripping, rather than throughout the entire structure. This localized application provides enhanced grip where needed while keeping other areas simple for manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The serrated structure is formed as an integral part of the injection-molded plastic neck, creating a simple geometric feature that requires no additional manufacturing steps. The serrations are formed directly during molding, avoiding complex secondary operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Weight of moving object

If the neck is made from lightweight plastic material, then weight is reduced, but strength and structural integrity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneck weightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The neck utilizes the inherent properties of lightweight plastic materials (such as polyethylene terephthalate or high density polyethylene) and combines them with a multi-component structural design including the support collar, support flange, and upper washer to achieve both light weight and sufficient structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The neck is segmented into multiple functional parts (lower support collar, support flange, cylindrical part, upper washer) that work together to distribute mechanical loads and enhance overall structural strength while maintaining lightweight construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If elements for retaining the neck in the gland are added, then reliability of attachment is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidretention mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retention function is merged with the lower support collar structure, which is formed as an integral part of the neck. The collar's geometry and its interaction with the gland provide both structural support and retention functionality in a single integrated component rather than separate retention elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lower support collar is designed to mate with the gland through its own geometric features, providing self-retention without requiring additional fastening elements. The structure utilizes the existing gland geometry and the collar's configuration to achieve reliable attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12397959B2Neck for glands of liquid containers
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 BETAPACK SAU
  • US12397959B2 patent drawing
  • US12397959B2 patent drawing
  • US12397959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container for liquids, specifically a neck designed to be axially coupled to the gland of a container, typically made of lightweight plastic. The neck is structured in a lower section and an upper section, having several components: a lower collar that serves as a support, followed by a support flange and a cylindrical part that incorporates both lower and upper transitions, as well as an intermediate section. The terminal part of the neck is an upper washer designed to receive a sealing plug. This washer includes a lower ring, a straight portion and an upper ring. The complete design ensures an effective threaded engagement with the sealing plug, thus optimizing the functionality of the container.