Lignosulfonic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Biomass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biomass, such as dilute acid and steam explosion, face limitations in xylose yield and lignin removal, leading to high enzyme costs and energy-intensive processes, while existing delignification methods are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A process involving lignosulfonic acid pretreatment with a concentration greater than 0.02 mol/L and sulfur dioxide greater than 15 wt% at temperatures between 110°C and 150°C for at least 30 minutes, which promotes both lignin and hemicellulose dissolution, reducing enzyme requirements and improving enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If dilute acid pretreatment is used to solubilize hemicellulose, then cellulose accessibility to enzymes is improved, but xylose yield is limited due to degradation products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellulose accessibilityVSAvoidxylose yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of pretreatment by using lignosulfonic acid instead of dilute mineral acids, operating at milder temperatures (110-150°C) to prevent xylose degradation while maintaining hemicellulose solubilization and cellulose accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Lignosulfonic acid acts as an intermediary substance that facilitates hemicellulose removal and cellulose accessibility improvement without causing the severe degradation of xylose that occurs with traditional mineral acid pretreatments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If steam explosion pretreatment is applied to promote hemicellulose hydrolysis, then enzymatic digestibility is improved, but lignin removal is limited and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzymatic digestibilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the thermal and chemical parameters by conducting pretreatment at lower temperatures (110-150°C) with lignosulfonic acid, reducing the energy input required compared to steam explosion while achieving comparable or superior enzymatic digestibility through enhanced lignin removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent selectively extracts and removes lignin from the lignocellulosic biomass using lignosulfonic acid pretreatment, improving enzymatic digestibility by eliminating the barrier that lignin presents to enzyme access, without requiring the high energy input of steam explosion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If existing delignification methods are used to remove lignin, then cellulose accessibility is improved, but process cost and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellulose accessibilityVSAvoidprocess cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs lignosulfonic acid, a relatively inexpensive and readily available chemical, as the delignifying agent, replacing costly and energy-intensive conventional delignification methods while achieving effective lignin removal and cellulose accessibility improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical approach to delignification by using lignosulfonic acid at milder conditions (110-150°C), reducing both the direct chemical costs and the energy consumption associated with high-temperature delignification processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If high enzyme loading is used to overcome biomass recalcitrance, then glucose yield is improved, but overall process cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglucose yieldVSAvoidprocess cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary delignification and hemicellulose removal actions before enzymatic hydrolysis, preparing the biomass in advance to be more receptive to enzyme action, thereby reducing the amount of enzyme needed to achieve high glucose yields

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes recalcitrant lignin and hemicellulose components before enzymatic hydrolysis, eliminating barriers that would otherwise require excessive enzyme loading, thus reducing enzyme costs while maintaining high glucose productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances enzymatic digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass, achieving high xylose yield and lignin removal without excessive degradation, thereby reducing the overall cost and energy consumption of biofuel production.

Implementation Method 1

pretreating with lignosulfonic acid promotes both lignin and hemicellulose dissolution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

lignocellulosic biomass is pretreated with sulfur dioxide... concentration of lignosulfonic acid is greater than 0.02 mol/L and sulfur dioxide greater than 15 wt%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSulfonation: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11312977B2Pretreatment with lignosulfonic acid
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 IOGEN CORPORATION
  • US11312977B2 patent drawing
  • US11312977B2 patent drawing
  • US11312977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for converting lignocellulosic biomass to glucose or ethanol includes subjecting the lignocellulosic biomass to a lignosulfonic acid pretreatment, wherein the lignosulfonic acid has a concentration of sulfonate groups in acid form that is greater than 0.02 mol/L and a total amount of sulfur dioxide is greater than 15 wt % based on dry weight of lignocellulosic biomass.