Exercise Device Limb Interface Gimbal Lock Prevention
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing exercise machine interfaces fail to comfortably and realistically perform complex motions like throwing due to issues such as pain, joint locking, and flipping, caused by gimbal lock, which disrupts natural movement.
Innovation Solution
A limb interface device with a handle member mounted within an inner frame, featuring multiple axes of rotation with limited joints and a centering biasing arrangement, such as a coil spring or rubber bungee, to prevent gimbal lock and allow smooth complex motion exercise.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a handle interface allows free rotation on multiple axes to enable complex motions, then the range of motion is improved, but gimbal lock occurs causing joint locking and flipping
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic rotation limits that adapt based on the current orientation of the handle. As the handle approaches orientations that would cause gimbal lock, the rotation limits dynamically adjust to prevent the singular configuration, while still allowing full range of motion in safe orientations. This is achieved through controllers that monitor joint angles and adjust soft limits in real-time.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces intermediate computational layers (controllers and software algorithms) that mediate between the user's input forces and the mechanical joints. These intermediaries calculate optimal rotation limits based on current orientation, preventing gimbal lock without restricting natural movement patterns. The intermediary system translates complex multi-axis motion requirements into safe, constrained joint movements.
2Reliability
If rotation limits are imposed on joints to prevent gimbal lock, then joint stability is improved, but natural movement patterns are restricted
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs dynamic rotation limits that change in real-time based on the handle's orientation. Rather than imposing fixed, conservative limits that restrict natural movement, the system continuously adjusts the allowable rotation range to maximize freedom of motion while preventing gimbal lock only when necessary. This creates an invisible constraint system that feels natural to the user.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically changes the parameters (rotation limits) based on the operational state (joint angles and orientation). When the handle is in safe orientations, full rotation is permitted. When approaching dangerous orientations, the parameters are adjusted to prevent gimbal lock. This parameter adaptation occurs seamlessly, maintaining movement naturalness.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple rotational joints are used to enable complex three-dimensional motion, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the control system universal by implementing a single software-based solution that handles all rotation limit calculations for multiple joints. Rather than requiring separate mechanical constraint mechanisms for each joint, a universal controller algorithm manages all joints, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining full three-dimensional motion capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces complex mechanical constraint systems with software-based control. Instead of using additional mechanical stops, springs, or physical constraints to prevent gimbal lock, the system uses computational algorithms to monitor and limit joint rotations. This substitution dramatically reduces device complexity while maintaining the same functional benefits.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables users to perform complex motions like throwing without discomfort or disruption, preventing gimbal lock and maintaining natural biomechanical movement by strategically engaging other joints to avoid interference with the user's arm or wrist.
Implementation Method 1
The centering biasing arrangement can include a coil spring secured to and extending along an outer perimeter of the outer arc member for biasing the outer arc member
Implementation Method 2
The handle member can be rotatably mounted about the first axis to an inner race of a bearing that is rotatable about the second axis within an outer race of the bearing
Data Source
AI summary
A limb interface device for an exercise apparatus includes a handle member within an inner frame member rotatable about a first axis with a first joint, for gripping by a user. At least one outer support member supports the inner frame member. The inner frame member is rotatable about a second axis orthogonal to the first axis with a second joint. An outer arc member supports the at least one support member. The at least one support member is rotatable about a third axis orthogonal to the second axis with a third joint. An arm member supports the outer arc member. The outer arc member can rotate about a fourth axis that is orthogonal to the third axis with a fourth joint. The arm member can also be rotatable about a fifth axis that is longitudinal to the arm member and orthogonal to the fourth axis with a fifth joint.


