Aircraft Piloting Interface With Limited Commands for Urban Air Taxis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The development of fleets of air taxi-type vehicles with current aircraft piloting rules requires a high number of qualified pilots, and the complete automation of piloting without human intervention in urban environments is challenging due to safety concerns and the risk of collision.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft piloting system with a control system configured to operate flight controls according to a pre-programmed trajectory, featuring a limited man-machine interface that allows only a predetermined set of piloting commands, reducing the need for extensive pilot training and enabling reduced human intervention, with an automatic pilot system and anti-collision detection, navigation, and communication systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current aircraft piloting rules are applied to air taxi fleets, then operational safety can be maintained with qualified pilots, but the requirement for a very large number of pilots makes fleet development highly unlikely and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidnumber of qualified pilots required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft piloting system enables the aircraft to perform piloting operations autonomously through an on-board autopilot that executes pre-programmed flight trajectories. The system includes navigation systems, anti-collision detection systems, and automated control mechanisms that allow the aircraft to navigate, avoid obstacles, and return to predetermined trajectories without continuous human intervention, thereby eliminating the need for large numbers of qualified pilots while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human pilots manually controlling aircraft with an automated electronic piloting system. The control system uses electronic autopilot technology, navigation systems, and automated collision avoidance mechanisms to substitute human piloting operations, thereby reducing the complexity associated with training and managing large numbers of pilots

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If fully automated piloting without human intervention is implemented, then the need for pilots is reduced, but safety concerns and collision risks in urban environments make this difficult to envision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman intervention requiredVSAvoidsafety and collision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The piloting system incorporates continuous feedback mechanisms through navigation systems that monitor the aircraft's position and compare it with the pre-programmed flight trajectory, and anti-collision detection systems that continuously scan the environment for obstacles. This feedback enables the automated system to detect deviations and potential hazards, then automatically correct course or initiate avoidance maneuvers, ensuring safety without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs preliminary actions by pre-programming flight trajectories before departure and pre-establishing avoidance proposals for potential collision scenarios. The navigation system calculates optimal flight paths in advance, and the anti-collision system prepares avoidance maneuvers beforehand, allowing the aircraft to respond automatically and safely to urban environment challenges without waiting for human pilot intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If a limited man-machine interface with predetermined commands is used, then pilot training requirements are reduced and human intervention is minimized, but the operator has fewer control options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot training requirementsVSAvoidcontrol options available
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex piloting control functions from the human operator interface and relocates them to the on-board autopilot system. The man-machine interface is reduced to essential commands only (such as initiating flight, requesting return to trajectory, or emergency interventions), while the autopilot handles navigation, trajectory following, and collision avoidance autonomously. This extraction simplifies the interface for operators while maintaining system versatility through automated capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4066079B1Aircraft piloting system
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 THALES SA
  • EP4066079B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4066079B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4066079B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention concerns an aircraft piloting system comprising a control system (4) configured to actuate flight controls (6) of the aircraft depending on a preprogrammed flight path, the control system comprising an autopilot system (8), the aircraft piloting system (2) further comprising a human/machine interface (20) comprising a control member interface (28) for control members that can be actuated by an operator in order to actuate controls and modify the flight of the aircraft. The control member interface (28) comprises a limited number of control members that can be actuated by a piloting operator, only allowing piloting controls from a predetermined set of piloting controls to be carried out.