Line Laser Fusion for High-Rate, Stable Selective Melting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current selective laser melting (SLM) processes are limited by the highly localized nature of round laser beams, which restricts build rate and quality due to instability in melt pools and inefficiencies in energy distribution, leading to defects and reduced surface quality.

Innovation Solution

The use of line-shaped laser sources with modulated intensity profiles allows for controlled spatial and temporal energy distribution on the build surface, enabling higher power delivery without increasing scanning speed, thus achieving higher build rates and resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a round laser beam is used for selective laser melting, then the laser can be easily focused and controlled, but the build rate is limited and melt pool stability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild rateVSAvoidfeature resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the laser beam into multiple discrete spots arranged in a line pattern, transforming a single round beam into a segmented linear array. This segmentation allows the laser energy to be distributed along a line, increasing the effective processing width and build rate while maintaining control over each individual spot for feature resolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a point-based (0D) or circular (1D) laser beam to a linear (1D) array of spots, adding a spatial dimension to the energy distribution. This dimensional change from round to line projection enables simultaneous processing of multiple locations, directly addressing the build rate limitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the laser scanning speed is increased to achieve higher build rate, then productivity improves, but melt pool stability deteriorates and defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild rateVSAvoidmelt pool stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The line-shaped laser projection performs preliminary heating across a broader area before complete melting occurs. This preliminary action distributes thermal energy along the line, pre-conditioning the material and reducing the thermal shock that causes melt pool instability at high scanning speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous line projection maintains uninterrupted energy delivery along the entire line length, ensuring stable and consistent heating. This continuous action prevents the intermittent heating that occurs with spot-by-spot scanning, thereby stabilizing the melt pool even at higher scanning speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple laser beams are installed to increase build rate, then productivity improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild rateVSAvoidnumber of laser beams
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes a single laser beam perform multiple functions by shaping it into a line projection that can simultaneously process multiple locations. This multi-functional approach allows one laser to replace what would traditionally require multiple lasers, reducing device complexity while maintaining improved productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the spatial distribution parameter of the laser beam from a concentrated round spot to an extended line pattern. This parameter change in beam geometry allows a single laser to cover a larger area and process more material per unit time, achieving the effect of multiple beams without the associated complexity and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables simultaneous high build rate and resolution in SLM, overcoming limitations of instability and inefficiency in melt pool formation, while maintaining spatial control and reducing defects, thereby improving the overall productivity and quality of the additive manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

exposing a layer of material to one or more projections of laser energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

exposure of the first and second materials to the projections of laser energy heats the first and second materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

fusing at least a portion of the layer of material by exposure of layer of material to the one or more projections of laser energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS11602792B2Additive manufacturing by spatially controlled material fusion
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 VULCANFORMS INC
  • US11602792B2 patent drawing
  • US11602792B2 patent drawing
  • US11602792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses for additive manufacturing are described. A method for additive manufacturing may include exposing a layer of material on a build surface to one or more projections of laser energy including at least one line laser having a substantially linear shape. The intensity of the line laser may be modulated so as to cause fusion of the layer of material according to a desired pattern as the one or more projections of laser energy are scanned across the build surface.