Line Sensor Luminance Correction for Glossy Document Specular Reflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image processing methods for correcting shadows in saddle-stitch bound documents, particularly those with glossy paper, fail to accurately address luminance abnormalities caused by specular reflection, leading to undesirable corrections due to varying surface reflection characteristics and document curvatures.

Innovation Solution

An image processing method involving a line sensor to detect and correct the luminance of regions affected by specular reflection, using a determination unit to assess document placement and a correction unit to adjust image luminance based on calculated shadow and specular reflection ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional shadow correction methods are applied to glossy paper documents, then general luminance correction is performed, but specular reflection causes inaccurate correction and undesirable results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminance correction accuracyVSAvoidcorrection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document surface into planar portions and curved portions, and further segments the curved portions into specular reflection regions and non-specular reflection regions based on reflection characteristics. This segmentation allows different correction strategies to be applied to different regions, improving both accuracy and reliability of luminance correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different correction methods to different regions of the document. Specifically, specular reflection regions are identified and handled separately from non-specular regions using local reflection characteristic analysis. This local quality approach ensures that correction is tailored to the specific optical properties of each region, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If pressure is applied to prevent document floating from platen, then shadow problems are avoided, but damage to the copied document may result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshadow productionVSAvoiddocument integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of applying pressure to the document with an optical and computational approach. By analyzing reflection characteristics and identifying specular reflection regions, the system corrects shadows through image processing rather than physical contact, thus eliminating the risk of document damage while still addressing shadow problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If specular reflection regions are not specifically identified, then processing is simpler, but correction accuracy deteriorates due to varying surface reflection characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidluminance measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary identification of specular reflection regions by analyzing reflection characteristics before applying correction. This preliminary action involves detecting regions with specular reflection properties and marking them for special handling, which enables subsequent correction to be more accurate without excessively increasing overall processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively corrects luminance abnormalities in saddle-stitch bound documents, improving image quality by accurately accounting for specular reflection and document curvature, even with glossy paper, thereby enhancing the readability of images.

Implementation Method 1

a line sensor having a light receiving element which receives light reflected from a document

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

an image sensor 2405 such as a CCD sensor which then performs photoelectric conversion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric conversion: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

specular reflection light 2407, which is illumination light undergoing specular reflection on the document surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpecular reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8730535B2Image processing apparatus, method of imaging processing and storage medium
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 CANON KK
  • US8730535B2 patent drawing
  • US8730535B2 patent drawing
  • US8730535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus determines a direction of document placement relative to a scanning direction based on a direction of a shadow region in an input image when a line sensor having a light receiving element performs a scan and an image read from a book document by a reading apparatus is input. When the direction of the binding portion of the document is determined to be along a longitudinal direction of the line sensor, an image of a region read by the light receiving element of the line sensor from reflected light undergoing specular reflection from the document is detected based on the amount of variation in luminance between adjacent pixels in the read image of the book document. Luminance of the image corresponding to the region is corrected.