Linear Actuator Backup Load Path With Visual Failure Indication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing linear actuators lack clear indications of primary or backup component failures, making it difficult to determine if primary or backup components have failed, which can lead to operational issues in critical applications like aircraft systems.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a housing, ball screw, tie rod, friction springs, and a bearing with an interference fit, allowing for a primary load path and secondary load paths to maintain functionality and provide visual failure indications through a gap closure mechanism in case of component failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single load path is used in the actuator, then the structure is simple, but the reliability is reduced because there is no backup path when primary components fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator reliabilityVSAvoidload path complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures secondary load paths (through friction springs and bearing assemblies) that are ready to engage before any failure occurs. The friction springs are pre-loaded against the ball screw and tie rod, and the bearing assemblies are positioned to automatically take over load transmission when the primary ball screw-tie rod connection fails, eliminating the need for complex detection and switching systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The friction springs provide a pre-established backup mechanism that can absorb and transmit loads immediately upon primary component failure. The springs are pre-compressed between the ball screw and tie rod, creating a cushioning effect that prevents sudden load drops and maintains actuator functionality without requiring complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If no visual indication mechanism is added, then the device complexity remains low, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring component failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection difficultyVSAvoidindication mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs visual indication through the presence or absence of a gap that can be observed during inspection. When the actuator is properly assembled and functional, a specific gap is visible between components; when failure occurs, this gap changes or disappears, providing an immediate visual cue of the failure state without requiring electronic sensors or complex indication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Strength

If interference fit is used between bearing and tie rod, then the connection strength increases, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidfit precision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies precise interference fit parameters (e.g., 0.0015 to 0.0030 inch interference) that balance connection strength with manufacturability. By carefully controlling the interference magnitude, the design achieves sufficient mechanical strength while remaining compatible with standard manufacturing tolerances and assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures continued operation and provides visual indicators of failure, ensuring reliable performance and maintenance in aircraft systems by diverting loads through secondary paths and maintaining connection with the aircraft structure.

Implementation Method 1

a bearing (26) that may be interference fit with the tie rod (16) and clearance fit with the ball screw (14)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference fit:

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of friction springs (20, 22) in the ball screw (14) and around the tie rod (16)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10955033B2Linear actuator
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US10955033B2 patent drawing
  • US10955033B2 patent drawing
  • US10955033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An actuator may include a housing, a ball screw engaged with the housing, a tie rod disposed in the ball screw, a plurality of friction springs in the ball screw and around the tie rod, and a bearing having an interference fit with the tie rod and a clearance fit with the ball screw.