Linear Actuator for Flight Control Surface Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing actuators for flight control surfaces in aircraft lack efficient mechanisms for precise control and redundancy, which can lead to instability and failure in critical flight conditions.

Innovation Solution

A linear actuator system comprising at least one electric motor, a threaded shaft, first and second threaded nuts, and an output shaft, where the threaded shaft is rotationally driven by the electric motor to axially displace the threaded nuts, which in turn rotate the output shaft, allowing for precise control and redundancy through dual motor operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single motor is used in existing actuators, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability and redundancy are insufficient for critical flight conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into two independent motor systems (first motor 14A and second motor 14B), each capable of independently driving the flight control surface. This segmentation provides redundancy such that if one motor fails, the other can still maintain control, directly improving reliability while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual motor configuration serves as a preemptive redundancy measure, cushioning against the potential harm of motor failure before it occurs. The system is designed with built-in backup capability, ensuring that critical flight control functions remain protected even when one motor system fails

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If a dual motor system is implemented, then redundancy and safety are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveredundancyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator employs two independent motor systems (14A and 14B) with separate drive mechanisms, allowing each to function autonomously. This segmentation enables redundancy where one motor can compensate for the other's failure, improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Both motors are configured to perform the same function of driving the flight control surface, creating a universal system where either motor can fulfill the control requirement. This multi-functionality approach improves redundancy while the standardized design of both systems helps control overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If traditional actuator mechanisms are used, then the manufacturing precision is adequate, but the control precision and responsiveness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical actuation systems with electric motors (14A and 14B) that directly drive the threaded shafts (16A and 16B). This substitution enables more precise control through electrical signal modulation, improving responsiveness and control precision while reducing the complexity of mechanical linkages found in traditional actuators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed actuator system provides enhanced precision and redundancy in controlling flight control surfaces, ensuring stability and reliability even in the event of motor failure, thereby improving aircraft safety and performance.

Implementation Method 1

a threaded shaft rotationally driven via the at least one electric motor about a threaded shaft pivot axis, a first threaded nut axially displaced via rotation of the threaded shaft, a second threaded nut axially displaced via rotation of the threaded shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS20250145276A1Linear actuator for a flight control surface
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO KG
  • US20250145276A1 patent drawing
  • US20250145276A1 patent drawing
  • US20250145276A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A linear actuator for a flight control surface including at least one electric motor, a threaded shaft rotationally driven via the at least one motor about a threaded shaft pivot axis, first and second threaded nuts axially displaced via rotation of the threaded shaft, and an output shaft coupled to the threaded shaft, such that axial displacement of the first and second threaded nuts rotates the output shaft about an output shaft pivot axis that is substantially parallel with the threaded shaft pivot axis. Rotation of the threaded shaft in a first rotational direction via the at least one motor prompts movement of the first and second threaded nuts axially toward each other. Further, rotation of the threaded shaft in a second rotational direction opposite the first rotational direction via the at least one motor prompts movement of the first and second threaded nuts axially away from each other.