Low-Friction Linear Bearing Materials for Reduced Stiction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current linear motion systems, such as suspension assemblies, face challenges in reducing stiction and frictional resistance, leading to jerking and binding issues during longitudinal translation, which affects the smoothness of ride and durability.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a bearing with a low friction material, such as a fluoropolymer, and spherical filler particles with an average shape factor of at least 0.75, which reduces the static to dynamic coefficient of friction ratio, thereby minimizing stiction and enhancing bearing life and reducing surface abrasion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional bearing materials are used, then the bearing provides basic support, but high static friction causes stiction and jerking during motion initiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmoothness of motionVSAvoidstatic friction force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing uses a composite material comprising a polymer matrix combined with solid lubricant particles (such as PTFE, graphite, or MoS2) and filler materials. This composite structure provides both structural support and low friction properties, reducing static friction and eliminating stiction while maintaining mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the friction characteristics by changing the material parameters of the bearing surface. By incorporating solid lubricants and optimizing the polymer composition, the coefficient of friction is reduced, allowing smooth motion initiation and elimination of jerking effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If traditional bearing materials are used, then the bearing structure is simple, but surface abrasion occurs leading to reduced bearing life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing lifeVSAvoidsurface abrasion
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potentially harmful direct metal-to-metal contact into a beneficial low-friction sliding interface by using self-lubricating composite materials. The solid lubricant particles form a protective transfer film on contact surfaces, reducing wear and extending bearing life while the material composition is optimized for abrasion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of energy

If high friction materials are used, then the bearing provides high structural strength, but energy is lost to frictional resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrictional energy lossVSAvoidbearing structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces high-friction mechanical contact with a low-friction polymer-based composite system. The polymer matrix combined with solid lubricants creates a self-lubricating interface that significantly reduces frictional energy loss while maintaining adequate structural strength through proper material selection and bearing design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces stiction and abrasion, resulting in a smoother ride and longer bearing life by lowering the static to dynamic friction ratio and minimizing surface wear, thus improving the overall performance and durability of linear motion systems.

Implementation Method 1

The bearing includes a low friction material, such as a low friction polymer, adapted to reduce frictional resistance between the stanchion and receiver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 2

The linear motion assembly has a static coefficient of friction, μS, as measured between an inner component and an outer component, and a dynamic coefficient of friction, μD, as measured between the inner component and the outer component, wherein μS/μD is less than 2.0

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3313719B1Linear motion system
Publication Date: 2024.01.24 SAINT GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP
  • EP3313719B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3313719B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3313719B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A linear motion assembly having a static coefficient of friction, μ$, as measured between an inner component and an outer component, and a dynamic coefficient of friction, μD, as measured between the inner component and the outer component, wherein μS/μD is less than 2.0, such as less than 1.9, less than 1.8, less than 1.7, or even less than 1.6.