Linear Electromagnetic Actuator with Axial Gaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Linear electromagnetic shakers face challenges due to radial gaps, which complicate assembly, increase friction and wear, and reduce magnetic bias across the axial gaps, leading to non-linear force output and reduced reliability.

Innovation Solution

The design eliminates radial gaps and uses only one pair of axial gaps, with top and bottom radially polarized permanent magnet rings and a drive coil positioned between inner and outer flux cylinders, creating a compact and reliable electromagnetic inertial force generator. Magnetic flux loops with bias flux in opposite directions across air gaps and coil flux in the same direction, resulting in a net force linear with current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If radial gaps are included between stator and permanent magnets, then assembly is simplified, but friction and wear increase and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidbearing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the radial gap between the stator and permanent magnets, extracting the problematic air gap from the system. This eliminates the source of friction and wear on support bearings while maintaining assembly simplicity through direct contact or minimal spacing between components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If radial gaps are included between stator and permanent magnets, then assembly is simplified, but magnetic bias across axial gaps is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidmagnetic bias force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the radial gap, the magnetic flux path is shortened and strengthened, allowing sufficient magnetic bias to be achieved across the axial gaps without requiring a radial gap. The direct coupling improves magnetic coupling while simplifying assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If two pairs of axial gaps are included, then linear force output is achieved, but axial length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelinear force outputVSAvoidaxial length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of two pairs of axial gaps into a single pair of axial gaps by using radially polarized permanent magnets arranged to provide magnetic bias in opposite directions across the same gap region. This merging achieves linear force output while reducing axial length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses asymmetric arrangement of radially polarized permanent magnets with alternating polarity around the circumference, creating opposite magnetic bias directions across the axial gap. This asymmetric magnet configuration enables linear force generation in a compact single-gap design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances compactness and reliability by minimizing friction, reducing magnetic material usage, and ensuring linear force output with current, while maintaining efficiency and reducing inductance.

Implementation Method 1

drive coil positioned radially between the inner and outer flux cylinders and axially between the top and bottom magnet rings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The combination of bias flux and coil flux cancels in one gap and adds in the other gap because the bias flux is in opposite directions across gaps while the coil flux is in the same direction. Thus, there is net force on the inertial mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

top and bottom radially polarized permanent magnet rings between and in contact with an inner flux cylinder and an outer flux cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

Magnetic flux from the top and bottom magnet rings pass through the outer flux cylinder, across the air gaps, through the stationary flux returns, back across the air gaps, and through the inner flux cylinder back to the magnet rings to complete a flux loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11239736B1Linear electromagnetic actuator
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
  • US11239736B1 patent drawing
  • US11239736B1 patent drawing
  • US11239736B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic inertial force generator provides a linear output with improved compactness and reliability because it has no radial gaps and only one pair of axial gaps. Radial permanent magnet rings are directly in contact with inner and outer flux cylinders to provide magnetic bias. The magnetic bias flux flows across two axial air gaps to a supporting flux return structure. A current conducting coil drives magnetic flux across the same axial air gaps. The magnetic bias flux is in opposite directions across the two air gaps, while the coil flux across the two gaps is in the same direction. The combination of bias flux and coil flux cancels in one gap and adds in the other gap, producing a net force on an inertial mass and an equal and opposite force on the supporting structure. The resulting force is linear with current through the drive coil.