Linear Equalizer Control Loops for Transparent Link Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Automatic Gain Control (AGC) circuits are non-transparent to link training in linear signal conditioning devices, leading to suboptimal bit error rate, power management, and electromagnetic interference issues, and can distort transmitter waveforms, making it difficult for receivers to recover data correctly.

Innovation Solution

A linear equalizer system with a controller comprising a gain control loop, a crossbar loop, and a driver loop, each with a replica of the equalization paths, allowing for transparent link training by comparing input and output levels to maintain channel gain, using nested AGC loops to control gain variations independently of configuration and minimize noise amplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional AGC circuit is used to control gain, then output signal level is maintained, but link training transparency is lost and bit error rate performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput signal level controlVSAvoidbit error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer is divided into multiple independent equalization paths (first path with first VGA, second path with second VGA, etc.), each capable of being independently controlled during link training. This segmentation allows the system to maintain transparency to link training while still providing gain control when needed, resolving the contradiction between output level control and link training transparency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different operational modes: during link training, multiple equalization paths are activated to maintain transparency; during normal operation, gain control is applied to maintain output signal level. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance for different operational phases, improving both link training transparency and bit error rate performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If AGC circuit adjusts gain to maintain output level, then signal level stability is improved, but link training configuration optimization is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput signal level stabilityVSAvoidlink training configuration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary gain control configuration during link training by activating multiple equalization paths, allowing the link training to complete its configuration optimization. After link training is complete, the system then applies AGC gain control to maintain output signal level stability. This preliminary action ensures that adaptability is maintained during configuration while stability is achieved during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (number of active equalization paths, gain control activation) based on the operational phase. During link training, parameters are set to maximize adaptability (multiple paths active, gain control disabled); during normal operation, parameters are adjusted to maximize stability (fewer paths needed, gain control active). This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If conventional AGC is used in linear equalizer, then gain control is achieved, but electromagnetic interference performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain control capabilityVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies gain control locally to specific equalization paths rather than uniformly to all paths. During link training, multiple paths operate without aggressive gain control, reducing EMI. During normal operation, gain control is applied selectively to maintain output level while minimizing EMI impact on other paths. This localized approach allows gain control capability while reducing overall EMI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If limiting devices are used for gain control, then output level is maintained, but transmitter waveform is distorted and data recovery becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput signal level controlVSAvoidtransmitter waveform integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses replica equalization paths that copy the structure and characteristics of the main equalization paths. These replica paths are used during link training to maintain waveform integrity while providing gain control functionality. By using copies rather than direct limiting devices on the main paths, the system maintains waveform integrity while still achieving output level control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8681848B2Linear system for link training
Publication Date: 2014.03.25 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8681848B2 patent drawing
  • US8681848B2 patent drawing
  • US8681848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for equalizing channels is provided, which is generally transparent to link training. The apparatus generally includes equalization paths formed by an input circuit, a crossbar, and an output circuit and a controller. Each equalization path is coupled to at least one of the channels, and a controller has a VGA loop, a crossbar loop, and a driver loop. The AGC loop receives a first reference voltage and provides a gain control signal to the input circuit, and the gain control network comprises a replica of at least one of the equalization paths. The crossbar loop receives a second reference voltage and provides a crossbar control signal to the crossbar. The driver loop receives a third reference voltage and provides a driver control signal for the output circuit.