Linear Guide Rail Nitriding and Micro-Lubrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manufacturing process of linear guide rails is labor-intensive and costly due to numerous machining operations required to achieve straightness and surface hardness, which also affects the mechanical characteristics and corrosion resistance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of drawn steel with nitriding and post-oxidation treatments, combined with micro-lubrication, to enhance surface hardness and corrosion resistance, while minimizing the need for extensive straightening and machining steps, utilizing a C-shaped or L-shaped cross-section for the guide rail and slider configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If surface tempering by induction is used to harden the raceways, then surface hardness is improved, but the guide rails become bent, warped and twisted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface hardnessVSAvoidstraightness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The guide rails are pre-straightened after the tempering operation, before subsequent machining operations. This preliminary straightening action prevents the accumulation of deformations and eliminates the need for multiple straightening operations later in the manufacturing process, thereby resolving the contradiction between achieving surface hardness and maintaining straightness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the tempering parameters and introduces a controlled straightening process that adjusts the geometric parameters of the guide rail back to specification. By changing the process parameters and introducing corrective actions, the patent simultaneously achieves both surface hardness improvement and shape maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple machining operations are performed to achieve straightness and surface hardness, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the amount of work and time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestraightness and surface hardnessVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple machining operations into a more streamlined sequence by performing straightening operations at strategically chosen points in the process flow. Instead of treating straightening and hardening as separate, iterative operations, they are merged into an integrated process sequence that reduces total manufacturing time while maintaining precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Straightening operations are performed preliminarily after tempering, before subsequent machining steps. This preliminary action ensures that the guide rail is properly aligned before further processing, preventing the need for re-work and reducing total manufacturing time while maintaining high precision standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Shape

If manual straightening operations are performed by specialized personnel, then shape accuracy is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestraightnessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service approach where the guide rail itself is used as part of the straightening apparatus. By utilizing the guide rail's own structure and properties in the straightening process, manual intervention by specialized personnel is minimized, thereby reducing labor costs while maintaining shape accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The straightening process is designed to be multi-functional, serving both as a shaping operation and as a preparation step for subsequent machining. This universal approach eliminates the need for dedicated manual straightening operations by specialized personnel, reducing manufacturing costs while achieving the required straightness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces manufacturing costs and time while maintaining or improving mechanical characteristics, achieving superior corrosion resistance and wear performance, with a significant reduction in the number of machining operations needed.

Implementation Method 1

A method involving the use of drawn steel with nitriding and post-oxidation treatments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNitriding: Nitriding

Implementation Method 2

nitriding and post-oxidation treatments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP2347141B1Linear guide rail and method for the manufacture thereof
Publication Date: 2013.05.08 T RACE SPA
  • EP2347141B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2347141B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2347141B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present invention relates to a linear guide rail (10) suitable for co-operating with a slider (12). The contact between the linear guide rail and the slider is obtained by means of rolling elements (14). The guide rail is made of drawn steel and comprises holes (18) for operational assembly, and raceways (16) suitable for making contact with the rolling elements. The surface of the raceways is smoothed by means of abrasive tools. The surface of the guide is treated using nitriding, post-oxidation and micro-lubrication processes.