Two-Phase Linear Motor Coil Optimization for Thrust Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional linear motors face limitations in increasing thrust and stroke length due to magnetic saturation, especially when driving larger lenses in imaging devices, where higher thrust and longer movement are required.

Innovation Solution

A two-phase linear motor design with a specific coil and magnet configuration, where the winding width and average width of the coil are optimized within certain electrical angle ranges, and the pitch between coils is set to reduce harmonic components in the magnetic flux, thereby increasing thrust density and allowing for a longer stroke without magnetic saturation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the coil winding width and average width are increased to increase thrust, then magnetic saturation occurs which limits further stroke lengthening

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidmagnetic saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the coil winding width to be 0.6-0.8 times the magnet width and the average coil width to be 0.8-1.0 times the magnet width. These specific parameter ranges maximize thrust density while preventing magnetic saturation, resolving the contradiction between increasing force and maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Length of moving object

If the stroke length is increased to accommodate larger lenses, then magnetic saturation occurs which reduces thrust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestroke lengthVSAvoidthrust
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by changing the magnetic circuit design parameters, specifically setting the air gap to 0.1-0.3 times the magnet width and optimizing the yoke thickness. These parameter changes enable longer stroke lengths while maintaining sufficient thrust by preventing magnetic saturation in the extended magnetic path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If the coil dimensions are optimized to increase thrust density, then the motor size increases which may not be suitable for compact imaging devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust densityVSAvoidmotor size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the ratio parameters rather than absolute dimensions, setting the coil winding width to 0.6-0.8 times the magnet width and average coil width to 0.8-1.0 times the magnet width. This ratio-based optimization achieves high thrust density while maintaining a compact overall motor size suitable for imaging devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances thrust density, reduces harmonic components leading to less vibration and noise, and enables precise positioning, making it suitable for larger lenses in imaging devices.

Implementation Method 1

a linear motor driven in two phases, and comprises a two-phase coil and a magnet that is disposed along the drive direction at a position opposite the two-phase coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force (Lorentz force): Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11340515B2Linear motor, and lens barrel and imaging device equipped with same
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US11340515B2 patent drawing
  • US11340515B2 patent drawing
  • US11340515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A focusing unit (1) comprises a linear motor driven in two phases, and comprises a two-phase coil (10a, 10b) and a drive magnet (9) that is disposed along the drive direction at a position opposite the two-phase coil (10a, 10b). The winding width of the coils (10a, 10b) in the portion opposite the drive magnet (9) is within an electrical angle range of 120°±7.7°, the average width of the coil at the portion opposite the drive magnet (9) is within an electrical angle range of 144°±4.6°, and the pitch between the two phases of coil (10a, 10b) is an electrical angle of 90°+180°×n (n is an integer of 0 or more).