Linear Motor Mover with Extracted Magnets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric linear motors with stators comprising windings and/or permanent magnets are expensive and heavy, particularly for long trajectories, and require complex and costly power electronics, leading to high friction losses and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling an electric linear motor with a stator beam having ferromagnetic poles and a mover equipped with independently controllable rotor units comprising windings and permanent magnets, allowing for air gap control and levitation without additional components, thereby reducing friction and simplifying the motor design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the stator comprises windings and/or permanent magnets, then the motor can generate propulsion force, but the cost and weight of the linear stator increase considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion forceVSAvoidweight of linear stator
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the permanent magnets from the stator and relocates them to the mover, while the stator retains only ferromagnetic poles. This extraction reduces the weight and cost of the stationary stator structure, particularly for long trajectories, while the mover with embedded magnets provides the necessary magnetic field interaction for propulsion force generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional arrangement by placing permanent magnets in the mover instead of the stator. This inversion allows the stator to be a simpler, lighter ferromagnetic structure while the mover contains the magnetic sources, achieving propulsion through the interaction between mover magnets and stator poles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Length of stationary object

If the linear stator is made longer for higher elevator shafts, then the motor can cover longer trajectories, but the weight and cost add up considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelength of linear statorVSAvoidweight of linear stator
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By extracting permanent magnets from the stator and placing them only in the mover, the patent significantly reduces the weight per unit length of the stator. This makes it feasible to implement long-trajectory applications like high-rise elevators (50m or more) without the weight and cost penalties of conventional long stators with embedded magnets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a simplified ferromagnetic stator structure without expensive permanent magnets, making the stator more cost-effective and lighter. The mover, containing the magnets, becomes the primary magnetic component, enabling long trajectories at reduced overall system cost and weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If additional components are added to control air gap, then the motor control precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair gap control precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the mover serve multiple functions: it provides propulsion force through its permanent magnets and simultaneously generates attraction force toward the stator for air gap control. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate air gap control components, reducing device complexity while maintaining control precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the propulsion function and air gap control function into a single integrated system. The permanent magnets in the mover provide both the propulsive magnetic field interaction with stator poles and the attractive force necessary for maintaining air gap, combining two functions into one component set

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a more cost-effective, efficient, and reliable linear motor with reduced friction losses and improved ride comfort, suitable for high-rise applications like elevators, escalators, and other long movement tracks.

Implementation Method 1

The mover has in each of said counter-faces at least one rotor unit having at least one winding and at least one permanent magnet, which are arranged to co-act with the ferromagnetic poles of the respective side face of the stator beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The at least one rotor unit comprises at least one winding and at least one permanent magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

supplying, by means of the at least one drive unit a d-axis current component to the at least one winding of the at least one rotor unit to adjust the length of air gap towards given reference value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force control: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP3547513B1Electric linear motor
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 KONE OYJ
  • EP3547513B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3547513B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3547513B1 patent drawingFigure 2C~2D

AI summary

The invention refers to an electric linear motor, control apparatus, transport system and a method. The electric linear motor comprises a longitudinal stator beam (1); at least one mover (24, 26) at least partially surrounding the stator beam (1) and adapted to move along the stator beam (24, 26); which stator beam comprises at least two side faces (6A, 6B; 6C, 6D) located at opposite sides of the stator beam (1), each of the side faces (6A, 6B; 6C, 6D) carrying ferromagnetic poles (8) spaced apart by a pitch (8'), and which mover comprises at least two counter-faces (7A, 7B; 7C, 7D) facing the respective side faces (6A, 6B; 6C, 6D) of the stator beam (1). The mover has in at least one of said counter-faces (7A, 7B; 7C, 7D) rotor units (2, 3, 4, 5) having at least one winding (74, 76) and at least one permanent magnet (71) arranged to co-act with the ferromagnetic poles (8) of the respective side faces (6A, 6B; 6C, 6D) of the stator beam (1). The ferromagnetic stator poles (8) of the stator beam (1) and the rotor units of the mover (24, 26) are used for generating propulsion forces for driving the mover (24, 26) along the stator beam (1) as well as for generating attraction forces to levitate the mover (24, 26) around the stator beam (1) while driving.