Linear Motor Steering Control Without a Reducer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steering control devices for vehicles require a reducer, which increases complexity and cost, and do not allow for precise control of steering angle or efficient use of space within the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A steering control device utilizing a linear motor coupled directly to the wheel, eliminating the need for a reducer and enabling precise control of steering through multiple linear motors per wheel, allowing for a dual structure and efficient use of space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a reducer is used in conventional steering control devices, then the steering mechanism can achieve sufficient steering force, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering forceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the reducer component from the steering control device, extracting only the essential linear motor and coupling part components. This elimination of the reducer reduces device complexity and manufacturing cost while maintaining sufficient steering force through direct coupling of the linear motor to the wheel assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical reduction gear system with a linear motor-driven system. The linear motor directly generates the force needed for steering without requiring mechanical reduction, substituting a more efficient electromechanical system for the conventional mechanical reducer-based system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Force

If a reducer is used in conventional steering control devices, then the steering mechanism can achieve sufficient steering force, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering forceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the reducer component from the steering control device, extracting only the essential linear motor and coupling part components. This elimination of the reducer reduces device complexity and manufacturing cost while maintaining sufficient steering force through direct coupling of the linear motor to the wheel assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a simpler, more cost-effective linear motor assembly without expensive reducer mechanisms. By using a straightforward linear motor coupled directly to the wheel, the system achieves the required steering force at a lower manufacturing cost compared to traditional reducer-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If multiple linear motors are used per wheel, then precise control of steering angle is achieved, but the number of parts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering angle control precisionVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the steering control function into multiple independent linear motors, with each motor contributing to the overall steering control. This segmentation allows for precise control of steering angle through coordinated operation of multiple motors, while each motor remains a relatively simple, modular component that can be independently controlled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple linear motors that can serve both steering control functions and potentially other vehicle control functions. These motors provide multi-functionality, achieving precise steering angle control while their compact design and integration reduce the overall impact on device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If a reducer is used in conventional steering control devices, then the steering mechanism is robust, but the space required for battery and legroom decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering mechanism robustnessVSAvoidvehicle interior space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the reducer component from the steering control device, extracting only the essential linear motor and coupling part components. This elimination of the reducer reduces device complexity and manufacturing cost while maintaining sufficient steering force through direct coupling of the linear motor to the wheel assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent repositions the linear motor and coupling mechanisms in a more space-efficient configuration, utilizing available space in the vehicle architecture more effectively. By eliminating the bulky reducer and using compact linear motors, the system maintains robust steering functionality while freeing up valuable interior space for batteries and passenger legroom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces manufacturing costs, improves steering response, allows for varied steering feel, and secures space for batteries and legroom by eliminating the need for a reducer and enabling precise steering angle control.

Implementation Method 1

a first linear motor LM1 coupled to the coupling part 301, and the first linear motor LM1 includes a first shaft SF1 which is movable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

a permanent magnet 600 disposed on the yoke 800

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

The at least one driving unit may include a coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20230406402A1Steering control device
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 HL MANDO CORP
  • US20230406402A1 patent drawing
  • US20230406402A1 patent drawing
  • US20230406402A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a steering control device capable of controlling steering of a wheel using a linear motor. A steering control device includes a coupling part extending from a wheel and a first linear motor LM1 coupled to the coupling part, and the first linear motor LM1 includes a first shaft SF1 which is movable and a first joint part JT1 having one side rotatably coupled to the first shaft SF1 and another side rotatably coupled to the coupling part.