Linear Synchronous Motor Diagnostics for Track and Mover Faults

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing linear drive systems lack effective fault detection mechanisms, leading to inefficiencies and potential system failures due to undetected track segment or mover faults, which can result in reduced performance and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A fault detection system that includes a calibrated inspection apparatus and processing circuitry to identify faults by analyzing feedback signals from drive coils and sensors, using a combination of predictive models and neural networks to determine track segment and mover conditions, and a method for performing track and mover tests to identify and diagnose faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no fault detection system is implemented, then the system structure remains simple, but reliability decreases due to undetected faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection mover is calibrated beforehand with known characteristics before being deployed to test track segments. This preliminary calibration enables the system to detect faults during operation without requiring complex real-time calibration mechanisms, thereby improving reliability while controlling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback signals from sensors to compare actual mover behavior against expected behavior based on calibrated characteristics. This feedback mechanism enables automatic fault detection and diagnosis, improving system reliability through continuous monitoring without requiring overly complex manual inspection procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a comprehensive fault detection system is implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases due to additional inspection apparatus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection mover serves multiple functions: it is both a test object (being calibrated) and a testing tool (used to inspect track segments). This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated inspection equipment, thereby improving fault detection capability while limiting the increase in overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified model or copy of the mover's expected behavior based on calibrated characteristics. This model is then compared against actual behavior to detect faults, enabling comprehensive fault detection without requiring equally complex physical inspection apparatus for every possible fault condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If real-time fault detection is implemented, then system performance improves, but loss of time increases due to testing procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Calibration of the inspection mover is performed in advance during scheduled maintenance periods rather than during operational testing. This preliminary action separates the time-consuming calibration process from performance-critical testing, allowing real-time fault detection during operation without significant loss of productive time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs focused testing on specific track segments or mover components based on operational needs rather than comprehensive testing of all system elements. This partial action approach maintains high system performance by minimizing testing time while still detecting critical faults that would impact productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If precise fault diagnosis is implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to advanced processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis precisionVSAvoidprocessing circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from sensors to continuously monitor mover position and compare it against expected position calculations based on calibrated characteristics. This feedback-based comparison enables precise fault diagnosis by identifying deviations from normal operation without requiring overly complex processing circuitry, as the comparison logic can be implemented through straightforward computational algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables precise fault detection and diagnosis, reducing downtime, improving system performance, and allowing for proactive maintenance, thereby enhancing the reliability and efficiency of the linear drive system.

Implementation Method 1

multiple drive coils are configured to induce travel of the movers along the track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

drive coils are configured to be energized sequentially to induce the travel of the movers along the track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

the feedback signals characterize relative motion between the calibrated inspection apparatus and at least one of (i) the track segments or (ii) the movers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition sensing:

Data Source

PatentUS20240375518A1Systems and methods for synchronous motor system diagnostics
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US20240375518A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375518A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375518A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting linear drive system faults includes a track, a calibrated inspection apparatus, and processing circuitry. The track includes track segments defining a path along which movers travel. Drive coils induce travel of the movers along the track. The calibrated inspection apparatus includes (i) a calibrated inspection mover that travels along the track and/or (ii) a calibrated inspection station including one or more of the track segments. The processing circuitry obtains feedback signals from controllers for the track segments. The feedback signals characterize relative motion between the calibrated inspection apparatus and (i) the track segments and/or (ii) the movers. The processing circuitry determines a fault based on the feedback signals and calibrated characteristics of the calibrated inspection apparatus. The fault includes at least one of (i) a track segment fault in the track segments or (ii) a mover fault in the movers.