Linear Linked Piston Generator With Stroke-Limited 4-Cycle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional linear piston engines face challenges with control, vibration, and efficiency, particularly due to their 2-stroke design, which results in poor fuel consumption and excessive emissions, making them unsuitable for widespread applications like vehicle propulsion.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a linear piston electrical generator system with a stroke limiter mechanism, comprising a pushrod, limiter rod, and rotation disk, allows for controlled piston motion, enabling a 4-cycle internal combustion process, reducing vibration, and improving efficiency by converting mechanical energy into electrical energy using a magnet and coil assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a 2-stroke free piston design is used, then the engine structure is simpler, but fuel consumption is poor and exhaust emissions are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine structureVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The engine cycle is segmented into four distinct strokes (intake, compression, power, exhaust) rather than combining them into two strokes. This is achieved through controlled valve timing and piston motion phases, allowing separate optimization of each stroke function to improve fuel efficiency and emissions while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The piston motion is made dynamically controllable through variable speed operation and adjustable stroke length, allowing the engine to optimize its cycle timing and valve events based on operating conditions. This dynamic control enables efficient 4-cycle operation without the rigid constraints of traditional fixed-cycle designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a single piston free piston design is used, then the engine structure is simpler, but vibration and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine structureVSAvoidvibration and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A counterweight mechanism is integrated into the piston assembly to balance the inertial forces generated during piston reciprocation. The counterweight rotates or moves in opposition to the piston motion, canceling out vibrational forces and reducing noise while maintaining the simplicity of a single-piston design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The engine operates at optimized frequencies and employs vibration damping elements in the mounting and transmission systems. By controlling the operational frequency and using passive damping, the design reduces vibration transmission while maintaining the simple single-piston structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

3Duration of action of stationary object

If conventional free piston designs are used, then the engine operation is continuous, but power setting control is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidpower setting control
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The engine incorporates variable speed control and adjustable stroke length mechanisms that allow dynamic adjustment of power output. The control system modifies piston velocity, stroke timing, and valve events in real-time, enabling precise power setting control while maintaining continuous operation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A control system with sensors monitors engine parameters (piston position, speed, pressure) and provides feedback to adjust fuel injection timing and quantity, valve timing, and piston motion characteristics. This closed-loop control enables precise power setting adjustment while maintaining stable continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances control over piston movement, reduces vibration, and increases efficiency by allowing a 4-cycle process, improving fuel consumption and emission standards, making the system more suitable for hybrid vehicles and stationary power generation.

Implementation Method 1

a linear power generator comprising a magnet assembly surrounded by a coil assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the fuel/air mixture would then become hot enough to ignite the mixture sending the piston back down the cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS11840957B2Adaptive linear linked piston electric power generator
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 BUNKER HILL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11840957B2 patent drawing
  • US11840957B2 patent drawing
  • US11840957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A load adaptive linear electrical generator system is provided for generating DC electrical power. The electrical generation system includes one or more power generation modules which will be selectively turned on or off and additively contribute power depending on the DC power demand. Each power generating module includes a pair of linear electrical generators connected to respective ones of a pair of internal combustion piston based power assemblies. The piston in the internal combustion assembly is connected to a magnet in the linear electrical generator. The piston/magnet assembly oscillates in a simple harmonic motion at a frequency dependent on a power load of the electrical generator. A stroke limiter constrains the piston/magnet assembly motion to preset limits.