Linear Pushing Mechanism for Substrate Attachment and Detachment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing substrate holding devices face challenges in securely attaching and detaching large, thin substrates due to bending issues and lack of automation, and are prone to scratching or breaking when processing warped or thin substrates.

Innovation Solution

A substrate attachment/detachment device with first and second retaining members that can hold substrates in multiple postures, allowing for linear motion and orthogonal locking to securely clamp and release substrates of varying dimensions and thicknesses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ferrule is rotated to engage with a damper to lock the substrate, then the substrate is secured onto the holder, but large thin substrates are bent by the rotation motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate locking reliabilityVSAvoidsubstrate flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the rotational ferrule engagement mechanism with a linear pushing mechanism. The pushing member linearly pushes the retaining member in the clamping direction to engage the clamping tooth with the substrate, eliminating rotational motion that causes bending of thin substrates while achieving reliable locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a pushing member as an intermediary between the actuator and the retaining member. This pushing member translates the actuator's motion into linear pushing action on the retaining member, mediating the force transmission to avoid direct rotational contact with the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If blocks are screwed together to lock the substrate by means of grippers, then the substrate is securely held, but automation of the holding process becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate holding securityVSAvoidholding process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual screw-together mechanism with an automated actuating mechanism. The actuator automatically drives the pushing member to linearly push the retaining member, enabling automated engagement of the clamping tooth with the substrate without requiring manual screwing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the retaining member with a resilient body that automatically engages the clamping tooth with the substrate when pushed in the clamping direction. The resilient nature allows automatic locking without requiring precise manual alignment or multiple adjustment steps, facilitating automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the substrate is carried with the to-be-processed face facing upward, then the device can be downsized without complicated posture changing mechanisms, but thin warped substrates are liable to get scratches or breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposture changing mechanism complexityVSAvoidsubstrate surface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies localized support through the resilient body of the retaining member that contacts only the peripheral portion of the substrate. This localized support prevents warping and surface damage of thin substrates during horizontal carrying, while maintaining the simplified horizontal posture configuration without complex posture changing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient body of the retaining member provides beforehand cushioning by elastically deforming to accommodate and support the substrate before any potential damage can occur. This pre-cushioning effect protects thin warped substrates from scratches or breakage during the carrying process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Area of stationary object

If the substrate holder size is increased to accommodate large substrates, then large substrates can be held, but the weight of the holder increases making attachment and detachment difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholder sizeVSAvoidattachment and detachment ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual attachment and detachment operations with an automated actuating system. The actuator automatically drives the pushing member to engage the retaining member with the substrate, eliminating the need for manual handling of heavy large-size holders and making the process easy to operate despite increased holder size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10665495B2Substrate attachment/detachment device, plating device, control device for a substrate attachment/detachment device, and storage medium that stores a program for causing a computer to execute a method of controlling a substrate attachment/detachment device
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 EBARA CORP
  • US10665495B2 patent drawing
  • US10665495B2 patent drawing
  • US10665495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate attachment/detachment device which clamps and holds a substrate by means of first and second retaining members of a substrate holder, the device comprising a first holder retainer configured to hold the first retaining member in a first posture; and a second holder retainer configured to be movable in a linear manner toward and away from the first holder retainer, capable of holding the second retaining member in the first posture and a second posture which is substantially orthogonal to the first posture, configured to push the second retaining member against the first retaining member in the first posture to lock the first and second retaining members to each other.