Linear Shaped Charge User-Fillable Cavity Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing user-filled linear cutting charges require careful handling and time-consuming processes to ensure explosive is in good contact with the liner, involving stemming tools and potential reduction in explosive density when unpacking high-density explosives like C4.

Innovation Solution

A user-fillable linear shaped charge design featuring a cavity with elongate channels and a delivery opening that allows for easy insertion of whole explosive blocks, eliminating the need for unwrapping or reforming, and including a sealed projectile unit and adjustable liner for various block sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional stemming methods are used to ensure explosive contact with liner, then explosive contact quality is improved, but loading time and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosive contact qualityVSAvoidloading time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is pre-formed with channels and a delivery opening during charge manufacturing, allowing explosive blocks to be directly inserted in their packaged form. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for time-consuming stemming operations during field loading, while still ensuring good explosive-to-liner contact through the pre-designed cavity geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery opening extracts the explosive block from its packaging and guides it directly into the cavity, bypassing the traditional stemming process. This separation of the filling function from the stemming function allows for rapid loading while maintaining contact quality through the dedicated delivery path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Quantity of substance

If high-density explosive blocks are unwrapped and reformed for loading, then explosive density is maintained, but loading time increases and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosive densityVSAvoidloading time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity and delivery opening are pre-configured to accept standard explosive block dimensions and packaging formats. This allows the explosive to be loaded in its factory-sealed, high-density state without requiring unwrapping or reforming operations, thereby maintaining density while dramatically reducing loading time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If delivery opening is provided for user filling, then ease of operation is improved, but charge complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading easeVSAvoidcharge structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charge body is segmented into distinct functional zones: the cavity for explosive containment, the channels for guiding the explosive block, and the delivery opening for loading. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently, achieving ease of operation through modular design rather than overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cavity structure serves multiple functions: it contains the explosive, guides the block through channels, ensures proper positioning against the liner, and allows for various loading configurations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, balancing ease of operation with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces loading time and maintains high explosive density, enabling faster and more efficient use with improved contact between explosive and liner, while preventing water interference and accommodating different explosive types.

Implementation Method 1

The charge is detonated at some point in the explosive above the lining apex. The detonation projects the lining to form a continuous, knife-like (planar) jet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 2

Linear shaped charges which are also known as linear cutting charges (LCC). Explosive is then loaded behind the lining and the explosive is encased within a suitable material that serves to protect the explosive and to confine (tamp) it on detonation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShaped charge: Shaped Charge

Data Source

PatentUS9534874B2Linear shaped charges
Publication Date: 2017.01.03 ALFORD RES
  • US9534874B2 patent drawing
  • US9534874B2 patent drawing
  • US9534874B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user-fillable linear shaped charge (10), comprising an elongate body (15) and a liner (30), in which the charge further comprises a cavity (50) adjacent at least part of the liner for receiving explosive material, the cavity comprising two elongate channels (50A, 50B) extending adjacent the liner, the body having a delivery opening (55) between the channels for receiving explosive material.