Linear Electromechanical Transducer for Pressurized Gas Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing linear electric motors and generators face challenges such as high manufacturing costs, complexity, and difficulty in integrating with pressurized systems, particularly in applications like Stirling cycle engines, due to requirements for robust armatures and efficient magnetic flux management.

Innovation Solution

The design features at least two flux modules with magnetic circuits and a gas containment structure surrounding the armature, where the flux modules are external to the containment structure, and the armature has reinforcing portions outside the gaps, allowing for high stiffness without excessive gap size, and detachable cores for modular construction and easy coil replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the armature is made robust and stiff to withstand pressurized environments, then reliability improves, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmature robustnessVSAvoidarmature structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The armature is segmented into a magnetic circuit portion and a reinforcing portion. The magnetic circuit portion interacts with the magnetic field while the reinforcing portion provides structural strength to withstand pressurized environments. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing portion is extracted as a separate functional element from the magnetic circuit portion. This allows the reinforcing structure to be designed independently to provide necessary mechanical strength without interfering with the magnetic flux paths, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the gas containment structure thickness is increased to maintain pressure differential, then reliability improves, but eddy current losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure containmentVSAvoideddy current losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The gas containment structure is segmented into regions of different thicknesses. The first region has sufficient thickness to maintain pressure differential and contain gas, while the second region is thinner to minimize eddy current losses. This segmented approach allows optimization of both pressure containment and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the gas containment structure have different thicknesses tailored to their specific functional requirements. The region requiring pressure containment has adequate thickness, while regions where eddy current losses are a concern have reduced thickness, implementing local quality optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the armature gap size is increased to reduce magnetic flux requirements, then manufacturing cost decreases, but armature stiffness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic flux managementVSAvoidarmature stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The armature is divided into a magnetic circuit portion that defines the gap for magnetic flux and a reinforcing portion that provides structural stiffness. The magnetic circuit portion can have optimized gap dimensions for ease of manufacture, while the reinforcing portion maintains armature stiffness independently of the gap size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves the stiffness-providing function to a different dimensional aspect by adding the reinforcing portion that extends beyond the magnetic circuit boundaries. This allows the magnetic gap to be optimized for manufacturing while the reinforcing structure in another dimension maintains the necessary mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If flux modules are positioned outside the gas containment structure, then manufacturing and assembly ease improves, but magnetic flux efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodular constructionVSAvoidmagnetic flux efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transducer is segmented into flux modules that can be positioned outside the gas containment structure. Each flux module contains complete magnetic circuits that generate flux through the armature. This segmentation enables modular construction and easier manufacturing while maintaining magnetic flux efficiency through proper design of the magnetic circuit paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic field acts as an intermediary that transfers energy from the flux modules positioned outside the gas containment structure to the armature. This intermediary mechanism allows the flux modules to be located optimally for manufacturing and assembly while still efficiently coupling magnetic flux to the armature through the defined gaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces material and manufacturing costs, minimizes eddy current losses, and enhances the transducer's efficiency and flexibility for various applications by maintaining stiffness and reducing the thickness of the gas containment structure, while allowing for easy integration with pressurized systems.

Implementation Method 1

Coils wound on the cores generate magnetic flux for driving movement of the armature or link with magnetic flux generated by movement of the armature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Axial movement of the armature 10 has the effect of varying the magnetic flux through the cores 4, which induces voltages in the coils 6; the polarity being opposite for neighbouring cores 4. If an alternating current of appropriate plurality is applied to the coils 6 then an alternating axial force is developed as desired

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

This may be required, for example, when the linear motor/generator is to be used in conjunction with a Stirling cycle engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9966817B2Electromechanical transducer
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LTD
  • US9966817B2 patent drawing
  • US9966817B2 patent drawing
  • US9966817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved electromechanical transducer is provided. In an embodiment, the transducer comprises at least two flux modules, each defining a magnetic circuit having a gap; an armature configured to move along a longitudinal axis passing through the gaps; and a gas containment structure laterally surrounding the armature, wherein: the at least two flux modules are provided outside the gas containment structure; and the armature comprises a reinforcing portion laterally outside of the gaps that is wider in a direction parallel to the flux in the gaps than at least one of the gaps.