Liner-Free Labeling System Using Cohesive Cling Coating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional labeling systems using pressure-sensitive adhesive labels are difficult to remove and require a costly release liner, leading to increased costs and environmental impact, especially when dealing with reusable containers and substrates.

Innovation Solution

A liner-free labeling system utilizing a polymeric anchoring site coated with a cling coating made from styrene acrylic polymers, ethylene acrylic polymers, or neoprene, which allows for temporary and reusable adhesion via cohesive forces, eliminating the need for a release liner and enabling easy removal and reapplication of labels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional pressure-sensitive adhesive labels are used, then strong adhesion is achieved, but label removal becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidlabel removal time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a dynamic adhesion mechanism where the label's adhesive properties change based on environmental conditions. The label uses moisture-activated adhesive that transitions from non-tacky to adhesive when exposed to humidity, allowing easy application and removal while maintaining strong bond during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The label's adhesion parameters are changed by controlling moisture exposure. The adhesive layer remains inactive (non-tacky) during storage and application, then activates when exposed to environmental humidity, providing strong adhesion during use but allowing easy removal by controlling moisture levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If release liner is used with conventional labels, then label application is facilitated, but production cost and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel application easeVSAvoidrelease liner waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the release liner component from the labeling system. The label is designed to be self-releasing from the substrate through controlled adhesion activation, removing the need for separate release liner material and its associated waste and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The label system performs its own release function without requiring a separate release liner. The adhesive's moisture-activated properties allow the label to self-regulate its adhesion, releasing naturally when environmental conditions change without needing an external release mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If labels with high tack are used, then strong adhesion is achieved, but label removal causes tearing and increases cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidlabel removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The label uses dynamic adhesion that adjusts based on environmental moisture. During application and removal, the adhesive remains low-tack or non-tacky, preventing label tearing. During storage and use, moisture activation provides sufficient adhesion strength, creating a dynamic balance between bond strength and removal ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces inventory and roll-changeover time, decreases costs by eliminating the need for a silicone-coated release liner, and minimizes environmental impact while allowing for easy reuse and reapplication of labels, maintaining adhesion across varying environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The label temporarily adheres to the anchoring site through the cohesive forces between smooth surfaces.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCohesive forces: Cohesion

Implementation Method 2

The film optionally further includes a non-polymeric material such as a plasticizer.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticization:

Data Source

PatentEP2895397B1Labeling system and method for repeat labeling
Publication Date: 2017.05.17 NULABEL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP2895397B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A reusable, liner-free labeling system, which allows labels to be wound without the use of a release liner, is described herein. The absence of a liner reduces inventory requirements, roll-changeover time, cost of production, and waste. Additionally, the labeling system described herein provides labels that remove cleanly, which reduces the time required to remove the label and eliminates the necessity of cleaning the substrate after removal. The labeling system provides labels that can be easily reused and reapplied, which can reduce time and costs associated with user labeling error. The labeling system is compatible with labels of all currently available facesheets, regardless of composition or physical characteristics, and allows for large quantity batch printing. The implementation of the labeling system does not require any changes to the pre-existing label printing infrastructure.