Lineside Tool Integration for Multi-Vendor Manufacturing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing execution systems (MES) require significant human involvement and detailed configuration to integrate new automated tools, as they have proprietary interfaces and instruction sets, making the process complex and vendor-dependent.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a lineside unit that connects to programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and manufacturing tools, facilitating the discovery of tool data and command sets, translating process definitions into executable commands, and asynchronously reporting results to the MES, thereby reducing the burden on the manufacturing control system and enabling integration across multiple vendors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If proprietary interfaces and instruction sets are used for each manufacturing tool, then each tool can be controlled precisely, but the integration complexity and vendor dependency increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool control precisionVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A standardized interface layer is introduced between the manufacturing execution system and various manufacturing tools. This intermediary translates proprietary tool-specific instruction sets into a universal command format, allowing precise control of individual tools while maintaining system-wide standardization and reducing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal interface standard that can work with multiple different tool vendors and types. This multi-functional interface allows the manufacturing execution system to control diverse tools (robots, CNC machines, 3D printers) through a single standardized protocol, eliminating vendor-specific integration requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed configuration is required for each tool integration, then integration accuracy can be achieved, but the time and human resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration accuracyVSAvoidintegration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Tool configurations and instruction set translations are pre-configured and stored in a database before actual tool integration. When a tool is connected, the system automatically retrieves the pre-prepared configuration data, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual configuration while maintaining integration accuracy through pre-validated settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses template-based configuration where standard tool setups are created once and can be copied and reused for identical or similar tools. This allows rapid deployment of new tools by copying existing configurations, significantly reducing integration time while maintaining consistency and accuracy across the manufacturing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If synchronous communication is used between control system and manufacturing tools, then real-time control is achieved, but the system responsiveness and throughput decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time controlVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic status polling and batch command execution instead of continuous synchronous communication. The manufacturing execution system sends commands in batches and periodically queries tool status, allowing tools to operate autonomously between communication cycles. This maintains real-time control capability while significantly improving system throughput and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240411282A1Manufacturing integration system
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 RIVIAN HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20240411282A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411282A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411282A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a plurality of manufacturing tools configured to perform a physical action contributing to manufacture of a product. The system further includes one or more programmable controllers coupled to the plurality of manufacturing tools and one or more lineside units coupled to the one or more programmable controllers. The one or more lineside units each configured to cooperate with the one or more programmable controllers to discover tool data describing services performed by one or more of the plurality of manufacturing tools, including command sets. The one or more lineside units receive a process definition from a remote manufacturing control system and translate the process definition into commands to the plurality of manufacturing tools according to the tool data. Results of implementing the commands is asynchronously reported to the manufacturing control system. The process definition may be retrieved directly from a manufacturing database.