Linguistic Model Database Segmentation for Recognition Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional linguistic recognition systems face challenges in accurately recognizing language inputs due to their reliance on general linguistic models that are optimized for a broad user base, leading to decreased performance with specialized terms, slang, abbreviations, and newly coined words.

Innovation Solution

A linguistic recognition system and method that utilizes a user-specific linguistic model database, updated through analysis of recognition-related information collected from client devices, which includes common linguistic model data and individual linguistic model data stored in a cloud server, allowing for improved inference precision by accounting for unique language patterns and real-time web trends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a common linguistic model database optimized for general users is used, then the system can serve a broad user base, but recognition performance deteriorates for individual-specific terms such as slang, abbreviations, and newly coined words

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser base coverageVSAvoidrecognition precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The linguistic model database is segmented into two distinct components: a common linguistic model database serving general users and an individual linguistic model database serving specific users. This segmentation allows each database to be optimized for its intended purpose without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between broad coverage and individual precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the linguistic model system are assigned different qualities: the common database contains general vocabulary and language patterns suitable for all users, while the individual database contains personalized terms, slang, and frequently used expressions for specific users. This local quality differentiation enables both general adaptability and individual precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the linguistic model database is updated frequently to include new terms and trends, then recognition precision improves, but the complexity of maintaining and updating the database increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition precisionVSAvoiddatabase maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects recognition-related information from client devices and updates the individual linguistic model database without requiring manual intervention. The server performs automatic analysis and integration of new terms, allowing the database to maintain high precision while minimizing maintenance complexity through automated self-updating mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of updating the entire linguistic model database, the system performs partial updates by selectively adding only the most frequently used individual terms and expressions to the individual linguistic model database. This approach maintains recognition precision for critical terms while reducing the overall complexity of database maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If individual linguistic model data is collected and analyzed from multiple client devices, then the accuracy of user-specific recognition improves, but the amount of data processing and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-specific recognition accuracyVSAvoiddata processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Recognition-related information from multiple client devices is merged and consolidated into a single individual linguistic model database on the server. This combining approach enables comprehensive user-specific recognition accuracy by aggregating data across devices while managing data volume efficiently through centralized storage and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If the system uses both common and individual linguistic model data, then recognition precision for both general and specialized terms improves, but the computational complexity of the recognition process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall recognition precisionVSAvoidrecognition process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recognition system dynamically selects and switches between the common linguistic model database and the individual linguistic model database based on the specific recognition task. This dynamic approach allows the system to use only the necessary database for each recognition scenario, improving overall precision while managing computational complexity through adaptive resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10217455B2Linguistic model database for linguistic recognition, linguistic recognition device and linguistic recognition method, and linguistic recognition system
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10217455B2 patent drawing
  • US10217455B2 patent drawing
  • US10217455B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of building a database for a linguistic recognition device is provided The method includes storing common linguistic model data configured to infer a word or a sentence from a character acquired by recognizing a language input by a user in a storage section of a linguistic recognition device, collecting recognition-related information related to the user after storing the common linguistic data, and analyzing the collected recognition-related information to be stored as individual linguistic model data.