Link Adaptation via Interference Probability Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, channel quality feedback information used for scheduling and link adaptation becomes unreliable due to discontinuous interference in packet-switched systems, leading to errors in downlink transmissions as interference conditions change rapidly.

Innovation Solution

Mobile terminals derive channel quality feedback information based on the probability of interference present, using statistical distributions of interference measurements to provide more reliable feedback to the base station, which then adjusts transmission parameters accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If channel quality feedback information is derived from a single interference measurement, then the feedback is quickly obtained, but the feedback becomes unreliable due to discontinuous interference changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime delay in feedbackVSAvoidreliability of channel quality feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile terminal performs preliminary actions by measuring interference multiple times before deriving channel quality feedback information. Instead of using a single instantaneous measurement, the terminal accumulates multiple interference measurements and derives feedback based on this accumulated data, ensuring the feedback reflects the statistical characteristics of interference rather than transient fluctuations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the mobile terminal continuously monitors interference and updates channel quality feedback information based on changing interference conditions. The base station uses this feedback to adapt transmission parameters, creating a closed-loop system that responds to interference variations while maintaining reliable communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If interference measurements are averaged over a longer period, then random noise errors are reduced, but the measurements become outdated due to discontinuous interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of interference measurementVSAvoidreliability of channel quality feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile terminal performs a limited number of interference measurements - not a single measurement and not an excessive long-term average, but an optimal number of measurements that balances precision and timeliness. This partial action approach derives channel quality feedback from a sufficient sample of interference measurements to reduce random noise errors while ensuring the feedback remains current and reliable for discontinuous interference conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If channel quality feedback indicates less interference than actually present, then data rate is increased, but transmission errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from multiple interference measurements to derive accurate channel quality information, which the base station uses to select appropriate transmission parameters. This feedback mechanism ensures that data rates are optimized based on actual interference conditions rather than transient measurements, maintaining both high productivity and transmission reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The base station dynamically changes transmission parameters including data rate, modulation scheme, and coding rate based on derived channel quality feedback. When interference is high, the system transitions to more robust but lower-rate parameters; when interference is low, it uses higher-rate parameters, thereby optimizing the trade-off between productivity and reliability according to actual channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If channel quality feedback indicates more interference than actually present, then transmission reliability is maintained, but data rate is reduced below optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoiddata rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a sufficient but not excessive number of interference measurements to derive channel quality feedback. This partial action approach ensures that random noise does not cause overestimation of interference, which would unnecessarily reduce data rates. The optimal number of measurements maintains transmission reliability while avoiding excessive conservatism that would limit productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2484036B1Link adaptation based on the statistical distribution of interfence and noise in a wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2017.11.08 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2484036B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2484036B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2484036B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A mobile terminal measures interference over multiple measurement periods and generates interference probability data based on the statistical distribution of the interference measured. The interference probability data may describe, for example, the probability of each possible level of interference expected at the mobile terminal. The mobile terminal derives channel quality information as feedback to a base station based on this interference probability data (e g., when noise at the mobile terminal falls below a threshold) Ln one embodiment the mobile terminal does so by estimating from the interference probability data the probability of success folly receiving a transmission if certain feedback information is reported. Derived in this way, the feedback information more reliably indicates interference likely present at the mobile terminal when the base station sends the transmission. Accordingly, the base station controls the transmission based on the feedback information, and in some embodiments, also based on the interference probability data.