Online Merchandise Link Fraud Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online marketing systems face challenges in efficiently detecting and preventing fraudulent affiliate, click, and order activities, such as cookie stuffing and auto browsing, which compromise the legitimacy of online consumer transactions.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that maintains a set of items for online link processing, registers affiliate systems, generates online links, detects digital activity, and permits or denies affiliate operations based on the activity, with communication to a fraud operations team for evaluation of fraudulent behavior, utilizing criteria like click thresholds and order patterns to categorize behavior as legitimate or fraudulent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented to identify fraudulent affiliate activity, then detection speed and efficiency improve, but system complexity and false positive rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent analysis modules, each evaluating specific fraud indicators (click patterns, affiliate behavior, order characteristics). This modular approach improves detection efficiency while managing complexity by allowing selective activation of analysis modules based on risk levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary fraud scoring system is introduced that aggregates results from multiple detection modules and produces a unified risk assessment. This mediator layer simplifies the overall system complexity by providing a single decision interface while maintaining the benefits of multiple specialized detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual review processes are used to evaluate affiliate activity, then accuracy in distinguishing legitimate from fraudulent behavior improves, but detection time and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of affiliate activity using multiple detection modules before escalating to manual review. This preliminary action filters out clearly legitimate and clearly fraudulent cases, reserving manual review only for ambiguous cases that require human judgment, thereby reducing overall detection time while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual review outcomes are fed back into the system to continuously refine automated detection algorithms and adjust fraud thresholds. This feedback loop improves detection accuracy over time while reducing the volume of cases requiring manual review, thus decreasing detection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive monitoring of all affiliate activity is implemented, then fraud detection capability improves, but processing load and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system applies different levels of analysis intensity to different affiliates and activity types based on their risk profiles. High-risk affiliates and suspicious activity patterns receive comprehensive multi-module analysis, while low-risk legitimate activity receives minimal monitoring. This local quality approach maintains high detection capability for fraudulent activity while reducing overall processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial monitoring by activating only the necessary detection modules for each specific activity type and risk level. Rather than running all analysis modules on every affiliate action, the system selectively applies monitoring based on predefined triggers and risk assessments, reducing resource consumption while maintaining effective fraud detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11488221B2Systems and methods for regulating online merchandise link activity
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 COUPANG CORP
  • US11488221B2 patent drawing
  • US11488221B2 patent drawing
  • US11488221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for regulating online merchandise link activity. The system may comprise a memory storing instructions and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions. The instructions may comprise: maintaining a set of items for online link processing, the items being associated with a website; selecting a first item from the set of items; receiving an electronic request from a first affiliate system related to the first item; registering the first affiliate system as associated with the first item; generating an online link associated with the first item and the registered affiliate system; detecting an actuation of the online link, the actuation being associated with digital activity; and, based on the detected actuation and digital activity, permitting or denying the first affiliate system from operating the online link.