Linked Downlink Control Channel Repetition for Random Access Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communications systems, user equipment (UE) may struggle to identify a timeline for transmitting an uplink random access message after receiving a downlink control channel order associated with linked control channel candidates, and may also face uncertainty in selecting a quasi-colocation (QCL) assumption when these candidates correspond to different transmission configuration indicator (TCI) states.

Innovation Solution

The UE is configured with rules for performing a random access procedure by receiving an indication that linked downlink control channel candidates are associated with a threshold delay period and specific QCL assumptions, allowing it to transmit an uplink random access message and receive downlink control channel orders efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE receives downlink control channel orders via multiple linked downlink control channel candidates, then the reliability of receiving the order is improved, but the complexity of identifying the transmission timeline and selecting QCL assumptions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of receiving downlink control channel orderVSAvoidcomplexity of identifying transmission timeline and QCL assumptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the UE with rules through RRC signaling that define threshold delay periods and QCL assumptions for linked downlink control channel candidates. These rules are established before the actual random access procedure, enabling the UE to automatically apply the correct timeline and QCL selection logic without real-time complexity, thus resolving the contradiction between improved reliability through multiple candidates and reduced operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the UE waits for a threshold delay period after receiving the downlink control channel order, then the accuracy of random access message transmission timing is improved, but the time required to complete the random access procedure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of transmission timingVSAvoidtime required for random access procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the threshold delay period parameter based on the specific configuration of linked downlink control channel candidates and their associated QCL assumptions. Rather than using a fixed delay, the system optimizes the delay parameter to achieve accurate timing synchronization while minimizing the overall time required for the random access procedure, thus resolving the contradiction between timing accuracy and procedure speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12557136B2Downlink control channel repetition for a downlink control channel order
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12557136B2 patent drawing
  • US12557136B2 patent drawing
  • US12557136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may receive an indication that a first downlink control channel candidate and a second downlink control channel candidate are linked for downlink control channel repetition. The UE may receive a downlink control channel order requesting the UE to participate in a random access procedure. In some examples, the downlink control channel order may be received via one or both of the first and second downlink control channel candidates, and the UE may perform the random access procedure in accordance with one or more rules pertaining to receipt of the downlink control channel order via linked downlink control channel candidates. Additionally or alternatively, the UE may receive, in accordance with the one or more rules, the downlink control channel order via a downlink control channel candidate that is not linked for downlink control channel repetition.