Liquefaction system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural gas liquefaction methods using open-loop refrigeration cycles face inefficiencies, high capital costs, and impracticality with coil wound heat exchangers due to high pressure drop losses and power requirements, limiting their practical application.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that divides a cooled combined feed stream into multiple streams for sequential cooling and flashing, utilizing a coil wound heat exchanger for indirect heat exchange and separation of liquid and vapor fractions, allowing for efficient liquefaction with reduced capital costs and improved mechanical design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a coil wound heat exchanger is used with multiple refrigerant streams on the cold side, then cooling duty can be provided, but the design becomes impractical due to high pressure drop losses and very high power requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling dutyVSAvoidpower requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cold side of the heat exchanger is divided into multiple passages, with each passage handling a single refrigerant stream. This segmentation allows efficient heat transfer while maintaining manageable pressure drops and power requirements for each individual stream, avoiding the impracticality of trying to fit multiple streams into a single coil wound heat exchanger shell side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If multiple refrigerant streams are placed on the shell side of a heat exchanger, then cooling capacity increases, but the device complexity and impracticality increase due to accommodation limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidheat exchanger design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of attempting to accommodate multiple refrigerant streams in the shell side of a single heat exchanger, the invention divides the cold side into multiple passages, each dedicated to a single refrigerant stream. This segmentation maintains cooling capacity while significantly reducing design complexity and avoiding the accommodation problems inherent in multi-stream shell side configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Temperature

If high pressure drop losses are accepted to use a coil wound heat exchanger with multiple streams, then cooling duty is achieved, but the power requirement becomes very high and impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling dutyVSAvoidpractical application
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger cold side is segmented into multiple passages, with each passage optimized for a single refrigerant stream. This approach achieves the required cooling duty while maintaining reasonable pressure drops and power requirements, making the system practically applicable rather than theoretically possible but impractical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances efficiency, reduces capital costs, and improves mechanical design by utilizing a coil wound heat exchanger for natural gas liquefaction, achieving improved cooling and liquefaction processes.

Implementation Method 1

cooling the feed stream to form a cooled feed stream and condensing the refrigerant via indirect heat exchange with the feed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIndirect heat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

The tube side defining one or more passages through the heat exchanger section for cooling the one or more feed streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

condensing the refrigerant via indirect heat exchange with the feed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 4

the shell side defining a passage through the heat exchanger section for condensing the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLatent heat: Latent Heat

Implementation Method 5

expanding the high pressure combined feed stream to cool the stream, thereby forming a cooled combined feed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic cooling: Adiabatic Cooling

Implementation Method 6

separating the liquid and vapor fractions of the two-phase stream to form a liquid stream and a gaseous stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Density Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3943852B1Liquefaction system
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 HERCULES PROJECT CO LLC
  • EP3943852B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3943852B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3943852B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems for liquefying natural gas using an open-loop natural gas refrigeration cycle; coil wound heat exchanger units suitable for cooling one or more feed streams, such as for example one or more natural gas feed streams, via indirect heat exchange with a gaseous refrigerant; and methods and systems for removing heavy components from a natural gas prior to liquefying the natural gas using an open-loop natural gas refrigeration cycle.