Liquid Additive Controller Using Disposable Cartridges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing horticultural watering systems face challenges in efficiently and cost-effectively injecting multiple types of liquid additives, such as fertilizers, into irrigation systems, particularly due to high implementation costs, pressure loss in venturi-type injectors, and unreliable dosage delivery in non-powered systems, which limits their application in residential and commercial settings.

Innovation Solution

A liquid additive control system that integrates a controller unit with a sprinkler timer, allowing for the simultaneous use of two or more types of liquid additives in different zones, utilizing existing sprinkler system wires for power and communication, and incorporating an integrated timer and flow meter to adjust additive rates based on environmental factors and plant types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metering pumps are used for liquid additive injection, then reliable dosage delivery is achieved, but implementation cost becomes too expensive for residential applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosage delivery reliabilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive metering pumps with disposable or replaceable injector cartridges that contain pre-measured liquid additive. These cartridges are inserted into a simple holder mechanism, eliminating the need for costly pumping equipment while maintaining reliable dosage delivery through the pre-measured cartridge design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical metering pump system with an electronic control system that uses solenoid valves to precisely control the release of liquid additive from cartridges. This substitution of mechanical pumping with electronic valve control achieves reliable dosing at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Use of energy by moving object

If venturi-type injectors are used, then non-powered operation is achieved, but system pressure loss becomes unacceptable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsystem pressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the passive venturi injector system with an electronically controlled solenoid valve system. This allows for precise control of liquid additive release without relying on pressure differential mechanisms that cause significant pressure loss, thereby maintaining system pressure while consuming minimal power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If flow-through injectors are used, then reservoir recharging is required frequently, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereservoir recharging frequencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the liquid additive storage into multiple separate cartridges, each containing a specific amount of liquid additive. When one cartridge is depleted, it is simply replaced with another, eliminating the need for recharging and reducing system complexity compared to a single large reservoir system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple liquid additive types are supported, then versatility is improved, but wiring complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadditive type versatilityVSAvoidwiring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal controller system with multiple solenoid valves that can handle different cartridge types through software configuration rather than hardware changes. The system can be programmed to recognize and appropriately dispense different liquid additive types through the same physical infrastructure, eliminating the need for separate wiring for each additive type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240188516A1Liquid additive controller system and method for horticultural watering systems
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 LIPS JON S
  • US20240188516A1 patent drawing
  • US20240188516A1 patent drawing
  • US20240188516A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid additive control system for use in a horticultural irrigation system such as a residential or commercial sprinkler system. The liquid additive is injected directly into the irrigation system. The system is capable of being introduced into an existing and/or newly installed irrigation system. Two or more different types of liquid additive can be connected to the same irrigation system, such as to provide shrub and bush liquid additive (e.g. a phosphorus liquid additive) for one zone and lawn liquid additive (e.g. a nitrogen liquid additive) for another zone. An existing sprinkler timer could be adapted to connect to a liquid additive controller and remote controller(s) and associated valve boxes and sprinkler heads, or a standalone unit could provide both sprinkler timer and liquid additive controller functionality.